Sunday 8 December 2024, 12:00 · Global Energy Stadium · Round 16 · Half-time 0–2 · Referee Kevin Clancy · Attendance 6,011
Rangers Igamane 6', Danilo 37', Tavernier 86'
Post-match
Result and Expected Points
Measure
Ross County
Rangers
Goals
0
3
xG
0.77
1.61
Expected Points
0.72
2.01
Ross County 15%Draw 27%Rangers 58%
Most likely score 1–1, 16%. Final score 0–3, 6%.
Own goals have no xG.
xG race
Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Stoppage time is shaded as far as the last shot or event recorded in it. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.
Match stats
Ross CountyRangers
0.77 −0.11xG1.61 −0.51
0.98 +0.24xG on target2.46 +0.41
9 −1Shots19 +1
2 −1.1Shots on target9 +2.8
1 0.0Big chances2 −1.1
11 −3Touches in the opposition box29 −2
33% −6Possession67% +2
246 −55Passes527 −36
68% +2Pass accuracy81% −4
22% −14Field tilt78% +7
21 −9Final-third entries50 −7
4 −2.7Box entries18 +1.3
13.9 −3Passes per defensive action7.8 −3
8 +4.5Corners10 +3.9
18 +2Tackles23 +6
9 −2.3Interceptions5 −4.0
31 −5Clearances22 +2
6 +3.4Saves2 +0.4
9 −2Fouls13 +1
3 +2.0Offsides0 −1.1
The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.
Chance locations
Ross County
Rangers
Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.
xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.
Game state
6'37'86'
0–10–2
0'HTFT
Level
6 min (7%) · Ross County 0.07, Rangers 0.09 xG
Rangers ahead
86 min (93%) · Ross County 0.70, Rangers 1.52 xG
Line-ups
Ross County substitutes
46'Brown for Efete
46'White for Chilvers
67'Brophy for Hale
79'Reid for Harmon
83'Grieves for Allardice
Rangers substitutes
71'Sterling for Cerny
71'Bajrami for Danilo
80'Diomande for Barron
80'Dessers for Igamane · yellow card 90+2', 1 assist
87'Dowell for Hagi
Players
Ross County
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Hamilton
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.04
5
1
Wright
CB
90
0.50
0.01
0
0.05
6
8
Allardice
CB
83
0.04
0.00
0
0.03
4
9
Campbell
CB
90
0.00
0.24
0
0.13
3
13
Efete
RWB
46
0.00
0.01
1
0.04
4
0
Randall
CM
90
0.00
0.01
1
0.06
5
7
Nisbet
CM
90
0.03
0.01
0
0.01
1
4
Harmon
LWB
79
0.00
0.01
0
−0.01
2
7
Chilvers
AM
46
0.05
0.01
0
0.01
2
2
Hale
ST
67
0.06
0.32
1
0.17
2
2
Samuel
ST
90
0.04
0.00
0
0.01
1
1
Brown
MF
44
0.05
0.07
2
0.04
5
2
White
FW
44
0.00
0.01
0
−0.10
0
4
Brophy
FW
23
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
Reid
MF
11
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
2
Grieves
MF
7
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
Rangers
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Butland
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.03
3
2
Tavernier
RB
90
1
0.09
0.26
2
0.25
10
4
Souttar
CB
90
0.08
0.02
0
0.09
7
5
Balogun
CB
90
0.04
0.00
0
0.07
7
22
Jefte
LB
90
1
0.02
0.10
3
0.16
12
3
Hagi
DM
87
0.09
0.10
3
0.14
7
5
Raskin
DM
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.04
5
5
Cerny
RW
71
0.21
0.24
1
0.17
5
0
Barron
AM
80
0.00
0.02
1
0.01
1
4
Igamane
LW
80
1
0.20
0.21
3
0.10
8
0
Danilo
ST
71
1
0.78
0.04
0
0.04
5
3
Sterling
DF
19
0.00
0.00
0
−0.02
0
1
Bajrami
FW
19
0.10
0.02
0
−0.02
1
0
Diomande
MF
10
0.00
0.02
1
−0.07
0
0
Dessers
FW
10
1
0.00
0.00
1
0.00
0
0
Dowell
FW
3
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.
Pass networks
Ross County
Rangers
Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.
Passing combinations
Ross County
From
To
Passes
Hamilton
Campbell
11
Brown
Wright
8
Campbell
Harmon
7
Wright
Efete
7
Wright
Brown
7
Rangers
From
To
Passes
Barron
Tavernier
19
Tavernier
Barron
16
Jefte
Hagi
15
Hagi
Jefte
13
Balogun
Jefte
12
The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.
Defensive actions
Ross County
Against its average of 15 matches
Rangers
Against its average of 14 matches
Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.
Threat
Ross County
Rangers
Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.
Ratings
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.
League probabilities
Chance
Before
With this result
Change
Ross County
Top six
11%
8%
−3
11th
19%
20%
+1
Bottom
27%
29%
+2
Rangers
Title
2%
3%
+1
St. Johnstone
Top six
9%
10%
+1
11th
19%
19%
0
Bottom
23%
22%
−1
Motherwell
Top six
76%
77%
+1
From the forecast before the match (8 December 2024): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.
Pre-match
As things stood before kick-off.
Forecast
Measure
Ross County
Rangers
Expected goals
0.75
2.12
Win
12%
69%
Expected Points
0.55
2.25
Clean sheet
12%
47%
Ross County 12%Draw 20%Rangers 69%
Most likely score 0–2, 13%. Both sides score 47%.
From the forecast as it stood on 8 December 2024: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.
League probabilities by result
Chance
Now
Ross County win
Draw
Rangers win
Ross County
Top six
11%
21%
13%
8%
11th
19%
14%
18%
20%
Bottom
27%
16%
24%
29%
Rangers
Title
2%
1%
1%
3%
St. Johnstone
Top six
9%
9%
9%
10%
11th
19%
19%
20%
19%
Bottom
23%
26%
25%
22%
Motherwell
Top six
76%
73%
75%
77%
Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.
The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.
Season to date
Measure
Ross County
Rangers
Position
8th
3rd
Played
15
14
Won, drawn, lost
3–6–6
9–2–3
Points
15 (1.00 per game)
29 (2.07 per game)
Expected Points per game
1.11
2.06
Goals
12–27
24–9
xG per game
0.88–1.51
2.12–0.88
Home: points, xG per game
1.50, 1.23–0.78
2.75, 2.76–0.70
Away: points, xG per game
0.43, 0.48–2.33
1.17, 1.28–1.12
Manager
Don Cowie (30)
Philippe Clement (44)
League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.
Ratings
This season
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.
Strengths and weaknesses
Chances
Ross County
Rangers
Created
Conceded
Created
Conceded
Open play
−57%
+27%
+77%
−45%
Counter-attacks
−33%
+4%
+114%
−36%
Set pieces
−33%
−18%
+20%
−33%
Penalties
+77%
−56%
−100%
−5%
Headers
−48%
+4%
+31%
−39%
Left side
−25%
−7%
+30%
−13%
Centre
−55%
+19%
+68%
−53%
Right side
−54%
+18%
+81%
−46%
xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.
Matchups
Ross County attacking
Ross County createdRangers concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−25%−46%Centre−55%−53%Right side−54%−13%Open play−57%−45%Counter-attacks−33%−36%Set pieces−33%−33%Headers−48%−39%
Rangers attacking
Rangers createdRoss County concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side+30%+18%Centre+68%+19%Right side+81%−7%Open play+77%+27%Counter-attacks+114%+4%Set pieces+20%−18%Headers+31%+4%
Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.
Season averages
Ross CountyRangers
0.88xG2.12
1.51xG against0.88
39%Possession65%
10.1Shots17.8
13.9Shots against9.1
3.1Shots on target6.2
1.0Big chances3.1
14.1Touches in the opposition box30.6
301Passes563
66%Pass accuracy85%
3.5Corners6.1
35%Field tilt72%
29.8Final-third entries56.7
6.7Box entries16.7
16.9Passes per defensive action10.4
Per league match this season before kick-off.
Game state this season
Ross County
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
50
0.98
1.08
Ahead
16
0.80
1.12
Behind
24
0.75
2.68
Rangers
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
41
2.21
0.79
Ahead
38
2.15
0.70
Behind
11
1.73
1.79
xG by period
Ross County
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.09
0.18
1–1
16–30
0.11
0.24
1–3
31–45
0.26
0.28
3–7
46–60
0.07
0.24
2–4
61–75
0.17
0.20
1–3
76–90
0.19
0.36
4–9
Rangers
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.47
0.12
4–0
16–30
0.25
0.07
2–3
31–45
0.26
0.30
4–3
46–60
0.37
0.14
4–0
61–75
0.38
0.18
8–2
76–90
0.40
0.06
2–1
Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.
This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.