Saturday 15 March 2025, 15:00 · Tynecastle Park · Round 30 · Half-time 1–0 · Referee Calum Scott · Attendance 18,648
Hearts Kabangu 26', Grant 89'
Post-match
Result and Expected Points
Measure
Hearts
Ross County
Goals
2
0
xG
1.73
0.29
Expected Points
2.56
0.27
Hearts 80%Draw 17%Ross County 3%
Most likely score 2–0, 27%. Final score 2–0, 27%.
Own goals have no xG.
xG race
Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.
Match stats
HeartsRoss County
1.73 +0.38xG0.29 −0.78
2.15 +0.79xG on target0.03 −1.00
9 −4Shots5 −5
4 −0.3Shots on target1 −2.4
4 +1.8Big chances0 −1.2
21 −4Touches in the opposition box6 −10
62% +8Possession38% −1
507 +67Passes307 +22
80% +3Pass accuracy62% −2
70% +13Field tilt30% −6
35 −6Final-third entries24 −5
16 +4.1Box entries5 −2.2
13.3 0Passes per defensive action13.2 −4
6 −0.4Corners6 +1.3
19 +1Tackles19 +2
11 +2.2Interceptions14 +3.9
33 +5Clearances36 −4
1 −1.6Saves2 −1.1
3 −8Fouls10 0
4 +2.4Offsides2 +0.9
The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.
Chance locations
Hearts
Ross County
Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.
xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.
Game state
26'89'
0–01–0
0'HTFT
Level
26 min (29%) · Hearts 0.16, Ross County 0.07 xG
Hearts ahead
64 min (71%) · Hearts 1.57, Ross County 0.23 xG
Line-ups
Hearts substitutes
66'Nieuwenhof for Spittal
66'Grant for Kartum · goal 89'
78'Forrest for Wilson
78'Drammeh for Shankland · 1 assist
Ross County substitutes
64'White for Chilvers
64'Hale for Kenneh
75'Grieves for Lopata
75'Samuel for Phillips
81'Robesten for Harmon
Players
Hearts
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Gordon
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
1
1
Forrester
RB
90
0.00
0.08
1
0.07
7
5
Neilson
CB
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.09
6
5
Steinwender
CB
90
0.00
0.02
0
0.13
9
25
Penrice
LB
90
0.00
0.20
1
0.32
4
4
Kartum
CM
66
0.12
0.10
0
0.10
3
2
Baningime
CM
90
1
0.00
0.28
1
0.06
6
7
Spittal
CM
66
0.01
0.06
0
0.04
4
3
Shankland
AM
78
0.00
0.22
4
0.06
4
3
Wilson
ST
78
0.10
0.04
0
−0.07
0
0
Kabangu
ST
90
1
0.22
0.01
0
0.00
0
0
Nieuwenhof
MF
24
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
5
Grant
MF
24
1
0.62
0.02
0
0.04
4
3
Forrest
MF
12
0.00
0.07
1
0.04
0
0
Drammeh
FW
12
1
0.65
0.41
1
0.18
2
1
Ross County
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Amissah
GK
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.06
7
2
Tomkinson
CB
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.03
3
14
Lopata
CB
75
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
3
13
Campbell
CB
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
1
5
Wright
RWB
90
0.00
0.01
1
0.01
2
8
Randall
CM
90
0.08
0.01
0
0.03
3
8
Nisbet
CM
90
0.00
0.04
1
−0.09
1
7
Kenneh
CM
64
0.00
0.01
1
0.03
2
7
Harmon
LWB
81
0.00
0.01
0
−0.02
3
3
Chilvers
ST
64
0.04
0.04
0
0.06
3
3
Phillips
ST
75
0.17
0.01
0
0.01
2
0
White
FW
26
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
0
0
Hale
FW
26
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
0
0
Grieves
MF
15
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
Samuel
FW
15
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
Robesten
FW
9
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
1
1
Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.
Pass networks
Hearts
Ross County
Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.
Passing combinations
Hearts
From
To
Passes
Neilson
Steinwender
20
Steinwender
Neilson
16
Forrester
Shankland
13
Penrice
Spittal
13
Baningime
Neilson
11
Ross County
From
To
Passes
Wright
Tomkinson
9
Nisbet
Harmon
7
Lopata
Amissah
6
Campbell
Lopata
6
Tomkinson
Wright
6
The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.
Defensive actions
Hearts
Against its average of 29 matches
Ross County
Against its average of 29 matches
Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.
Threat
Hearts
Ross County
Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.
Ratings
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.
League probabilities
Chance
Before
With this result
Change
Hearts
Top six
45%
59%
+14
11th
<1%
<1%
0
Ross County
Top six
13%
4%
−9
11th
5%
6%
+1
Motherwell
Top six
36%
33%
−3
St. Mirren
Top six
14%
12%
−2
From the forecast before the match (15 March 2025): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.
Pre-match
As things stood before kick-off.
Forecast
Measure
Hearts
Ross County
Expected goals
1.83
0.93
Win
58%
18%
Expected Points
1.98
0.79
Clean sheet
40%
16%
Hearts 58%Draw 24%Ross County 18%
Most likely score 1–1, 11%. Both sides score 51%.
From the forecast as it stood on 15 March 2025: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.
League probabilities by result
Chance
Now
Hearts win
Draw
Ross County win
Hearts
Top six
45%
59%
32%
14%
11th
<1%
<1%
1%
1%
Ross County
Top six
13%
4%
14%
38%
11th
5%
6%
4%
1%
Motherwell
Top six
36%
33%
41%
37%
St. Mirren
Top six
14%
12%
17%
18%
Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.
The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.
Season to date
Measure
Hearts
Ross County
Position
7th
8th
Played
29
29
Won, drawn, lost
10–6–13
9–8–12
Points
36 (1.24 per game)
35 (1.21 per game)
Expected Points per game
1.36
1.17
Goals
41–40
31–49
xG per game
1.35–1.39
1.07–1.62
Home: points, xG per game
1.50, 1.45–1.29
1.33, 1.40–1.21
Away: points, xG per game
1.00, 1.26–1.47
1.07, 0.72–2.07
Manager
Neil Critchley (20)
Don Cowie (44)
League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.
Ratings
This season
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.
Strengths and weaknesses
Chances
Hearts
Ross County
Created
Conceded
Created
Conceded
Open play
−2%
−12%
−48%
+32%
Counter-attacks
+5%
−7%
−23%
−14%
Set pieces
+10%
+6%
−8%
−13%
Penalties
−78%
+33%
+78%
+11%
Headers
−4%
+21%
−45%
+6%
Left side
+17%
−3%
−19%
+8%
Centre
−3%
−5%
−34%
+15%
Right side
average
−12%
−47%
+21%
xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.
Matchups
Hearts attacking
Hearts createdRoss County concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side+17%+21%Centre−3%+15%Right sideaverage+8%Open play−2%+32%Counter-attacks+5%−14%Set pieces+10%−13%Headers−4%+6%
Ross County attacking
Ross County createdHearts concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−19%−12%Centre−34%−5%Right side−47%−3%Open play−48%−12%Counter-attacks−23%−7%Set pieces−8%+6%Headers−45%+21%
Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.
Season averages
HeartsRoss County
1.35xG1.07
1.39xG against1.62
54%Possession39%
13.0Shots10.3
11.0Shots against15.2
4.3Shots on target3.4
2.2Big chances1.2
25.1Touches in the opposition box15.6
440Passes285
76%Pass accuracy64%
6.4Corners4.7
57%Field tilt36%
41.0Final-third entries28.9
11.9Box entries7.2
13.0Passes per defensive action16.7
Per league match this season before kick-off.
Game state this season
Hearts
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
40
1.31
1.50
Ahead
24
1.44
1.20
Behind
26
1.34
1.38
Ross County
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
45
1.11
1.41
Ahead
20
0.98
1.25
Behind
26
1.09
2.29
xG by period
Hearts
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.20
0.17
6–5
16–30
0.17
0.18
5–4
31–45
0.16
0.23
5–6
46–60
0.23
0.30
8–8
61–75
0.20
0.18
8–8
76–90
0.40
0.32
9–9
Ross County
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.14
0.19
2–4
16–30
0.15
0.20
4–6
31–45
0.23
0.34
5–13
46–60
0.18
0.23
8–5
61–75
0.13
0.27
2–5
76–90
0.25
0.41
10–16
Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.
This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.