Saturday 30 December 2023, 15:00 · Tynecastle Park · Round 21 · Half-time 0–0 · Referee Alan James Muir · Attendance 18,288
Hearts Vargas 71', Shankland 79'
Ross County Cochrane 55' (og), Dhanda 61'
Post-match
Result and Expected Points
Measure
Hearts
Ross County
Goals
2
2
xG
1.87
1.54
Expected Points
1.58
1.15
Hearts 44%Draw 26%Ross County 30%
Most likely score 1–1, 12%. Final score 2–2, 10%.
Own goals have no xG.
xG race
Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Stoppage time is shaded as far as the last shot or event recorded in it. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.
Match stats
HeartsRoss County
1.87 +0.79xG1.54 +0.67
1.34 +0.19xG on target1.02 +0.19
20 +7Shots14 +4
7 +3.0Shots on target4 +0.6
1 −0.1Big chances2 +0.5
32 +7Touches in the opposition box22 +6
63% +8Possession37% −7
522 +72Passes303 −24
81% +6Pass accuracy68% +4
58% +6Field tilt42% −3
57 +17Final-third entries24 −5
16 +3.9Box entries13 +4.0
13.7 +1Passes per defensive action16.3 +1
9 +1.9Corners5 +0.1
11 −4Tackles22 +9
5 −1.8Interceptions10 +0.5
16 −6Clearances26 +2
3 +0.3Saves5 +1.3
14 +2Fouls14 +2
2 +1.2Offsides2 +0.1
The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.
Chance locations
Hearts
Ross County
Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.
xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.
Game state
55'61'71'79'
0–00–21–22–2
0'HTFT
Level
76 min (76%) · Hearts 0.73, Ross County 1.42 xG
Ross County ahead
24 min (24%) · Hearts 1.14, Ross County 0.12 xG
Line-ups
Hearts substitutes
46'Forrest for Denholm · yellow card 51'
46'Oda for Tagawa
61'Kingsley for Halkett
62'Vargas for Lowry · goal 71'
Ross County substitutes
69'Brophy for Murray
78'Harmon for Purrington
82'Turner for White
82'Loturi for Sims
Players
Hearts
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Clark
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
1
0
Kent
CB
90
0.29
0.15
1
0.10
10
9
Halkett
CB
61
0.00
0.01
0
0.06
3
9
Rowles
CB
90
0.00
0.02
0
0.10
8
5
Atkinson
RWB
90
0.02
0.07
1
0.14
12
4
Denholm
CM
46
0.00
0.01
0
0.00
0
1
Lowry
CM
62
0.02
0.04
2
0.08
6
2
Nieuwenhof
CM
90
1
0.03
0.17
3
0.21
7
1
Cochrane
LWB
90
0.07
0.36
4
0.25
12
2
Shankland
ST
90
1
0.38
0.24
1
0.10
5
2
Tagawa
ST
46
0.29
0.13
1
−0.01
0
0
Forrest
MF
44
0.38
0.02
0
0.20
2
0
Oda
FW
44
0.00
0.05
0
0.12
4
1
Kingsley
DF
29
0.00
0.18
1
0.08
4
1
Vargas
MF
28
1
0.39
0.10
1
0.00
1
0
Ross County
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Laidlaw
GK
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.03
4
0
Brown
RB
90
0.00
0.20
0
0.20
3
7
Baldwin
CB
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.03
5
10
Leak
CB
90
0.11
0.00
0
0.02
3
7
Purrington
LB
78
0.00
0.04
1
0.08
3
5
Dhanda
RM
90
1
0.10
0.20
4
0.18
13
3
Sheaf
CM
90
0.05
0.00
0
0.03
0
5
Allardice
CM
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.02
4
10
Sims
LM
82
0.11
0.19
0
0.01
4
8
White
ST
82
0.24
0.01
1
0.12
3
7
Murray
ST
69
0.56
0.03
3
0.02
1
1
Brophy
FW
21
0.19
0.19
1
0.16
0
0
Harmon
DF
12
0.00
0.10
1
0.16
1
1
Turner
MF
8
0.00
0.01
0
0.03
1
0
Loturi
MF
8
0.18
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.
Pass networks
Hearts
Ross County
Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.
Passing combinations
Hearts
From
To
Passes
Kent
Atkinson
12
Kent
Rowles
11
Nieuwenhof
Atkinson
10
Clark
Halkett
10
Cochrane
Kent
10
Ross County
From
To
Passes
Sims
Dhanda
5
Brown
Baldwin
5
Murray
Dhanda
5
Dhanda
Murray
5
Laidlaw
White
5
The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.
Defensive actions
Hearts
Against its average of 19 matches
Ross County
Against its average of 17 matches
Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.
Threat
Hearts
Ross County
Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.
Ratings
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.
League probabilities
Chance
Before
With this result
Change
Hearts
Top six
99%
98%
−1
Ross County
Top six
6%
7%
+1
11th
21%
21%
0
Bottom
17%
15%
−2
Livingston
11th
23%
22%
−1
Bottom
46%
47%
+1
Motherwell
Top six
5%
4%
−1
11th
21%
22%
+1
Bottom
16%
17%
+1
From the forecast before the match (30 December 2023): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.
Pre-match
As things stood before kick-off.
Forecast
Measure
Hearts
Ross County
Expected goals
1.68
0.88
Win
56%
19%
Expected Points
1.92
0.82
Clean sheet
42%
19%
Hearts 56%Draw 25%Ross County 19%
Most likely score 1–0, 12%. Both sides score 48%.
From the forecast as it stood on 30 December 2023: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.
League probabilities by result
Chance
Now
Hearts win
Draw
Ross County win
Hearts
Top six
99%
99%
98%
97%
Ross County
Top six
6%
4%
7%
12%
11th
21%
23%
21%
16%
Bottom
17%
20%
15%
9%
Livingston
11th
23%
23%
22%
22%
Bottom
46%
45%
47%
51%
Motherwell
Top six
5%
5%
4%
5%
11th
21%
19%
22%
23%
Bottom
16%
16%
17%
17%
Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.
The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.
Season to date
Measure
Hearts
Ross County
Position
3rd
10th
Played
19
17
Won, drawn, lost
10–2–7
4–5–8
Points
32 (1.68 per game)
17 (1.00 per game)
Expected Points per game
1.21
0.99
Goals
20–15
15–24
xG per game
1.08–1.47
0.87–1.52
Home: points, xG per game
1.56, 1.18–1.33
1.22, 0.94–1.28
Away: points, xG per game
1.80, 0.98–1.59
0.75, 0.79–1.79
Manager
Steven Naismith (15)
Derek Adams (5)
League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.
Ratings
This season
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.
Strengths and weaknesses
Chances
Hearts
Ross County
Created
Conceded
Created
Conceded
Open play
−15%
+1%
−21%
+12%
Counter-attacks
−23%
−13%
−62%
+59%
Set pieces
−11%
+16%
−36%
+8%
Penalties
−70%
+52%
−100%
+2%
Headers
−35%
−3%
−21%
−11%
Left side
−11%
−2%
−22%
−2%
Centre
−22%
−6%
−40%
+25%
Right side
−3%
+33%
−10%
+9%
xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.
Matchups
Hearts attacking
Hearts createdRoss County concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−11%+9%Centre−22%+25%Right side−3%−2%Open play−15%+12%Counter-attacks−23%+59%Set pieces−11%+8%Headers−35%−11%
Ross County attacking
Ross County createdHearts concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−22%+33%Centre−40%−6%Right side−10%−2%Open play−21%+1%Counter-attacks−62%−13%Set pieces−36%+16%Headers−21%−3%
Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.
Season averages
HeartsRoss County
1.08xG0.87
1.47xG against1.52
55%Possession44%
12.7Shots10.0
13.8Shots against14.9
4.0Shots on target3.4
1.1Big chances1.5
25.2Touches in the opposition box16.3
450Passes326
75%Pass accuracy64%
7.1Corners4.9
52%Field tilt44%
39.9Final-third entries29.3
12.1Box entries9.0
12.8Passes per defensive action15.0
Per league match this season before kick-off.
Game state this season
Hearts
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
43
1.22
1.14
Ahead
30
0.80
1.64
Behind
16
1.22
2.01
Ross County
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
55
0.83
1.14
Ahead
13
1.56
1.73
Behind
22
0.54
2.36
xG by period
Hearts
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.12
0.21
3–2
16–30
0.21
0.25
5–2
31–45
0.08
0.20
1–1
46–60
0.15
0.32
2–2
61–75
0.27
0.15
6–3
76–90
0.25
0.33
3–5
Ross County
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.16
0.09
1–0
16–30
0.12
0.26
1–5
31–45
0.09
0.34
1–4
46–60
0.20
0.20
5–5
61–75
0.11
0.26
3–4
76–90
0.19
0.37
4–6
Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.
This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.