Saturday 29 January 2022, 12:30 · Global Energy Stadium · Round 24 · Half-time 2–1 · Referee Nick Walsh · Attendance 6,401
Ross County White 25', Charles-Cook 29', Wright 90+6'
Rangers Amad 5', Tavernier 49', Goldson 72'
Post-match
Result and Expected Points
Measure
Ross County
Rangers
Goals
3
3
xG
1.63
3.20
Expected Points
0.46
2.36
Ross County 10%Draw 17%Rangers 73%
Most likely score 2–3, 11%. Final score 3–3, 5%.
Own goals have no xG.
xG race
Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Stoppage time is shaded as far as the last shot or event recorded in it. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.
Match stats
Ross CountyRangers
1.63 +0.50xG3.20 +1.26
2.78 +1.56xG on target4.20 +2.12
6 −5Shots25 +6
4 −0.1Shots on target12 +5.4
4 +2.5Big chances4 +1.7
13 −4Touches in the opposition box50 +14
28% −14Possession72% +8
223 −89Passes574 +20
60% −5Pass accuracy85% 0
28% −12Field tilt72% −4
31 +3Final-third entries55 −2
6 −2.5Box entries22 +2.3
25.5 +9Passes per defensive action15.4 +3
4 0.0Corners8 −0.3
21 +8Tackles12 −2
10 −0.3Interceptions5 −1.3
34 +7Clearances12 −2
9 +5.6Saves1 −0.8
10 −2Fouls7 −4
1 −1.3Offsides2 +0.1
The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.
Chance locations
Ross County
Rangers
Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.
xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.
Game state
5'25'29'49'72'90+6'
0–12–12–22–3
0'HTFT
Level
33 min (34%) · Ross County 0.41, Rangers 1.94 xG
Ross County ahead
20 min (21%) · Ross County 0.00, Rangers 0.76 xG
Rangers ahead
44 min (45%) · Ross County 1.23, Rangers 0.50 xG
Line-ups
Ross County substitutes
57'Samuel for H. Paton · yellow card 70'
65'Watson for Vokins
83'Burroughs for Callachan
83'Wright for White · goal 90+6'
Rangers substitutes
59'Roofe for Itten
66'Sakala for Amad
90'Lundstram for Arfield
Players
Ross County
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Maynard-Brewer
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.05
4
0
Ramsay
RB
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.03
1
7
Baldwin
CB
90
0.00
0.18
1
0.03
3
12
Iacovitti
CB
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.05
2
14
Vokins
LB
65
0.00
0.01
0
0.01
2
9
Tillson
DM
90
0.00
0.01
1
0.03
3
9
H. Paton
DM
57
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
2
9
Charles-Cook
RW
90
1
0.37
0.03
0
0.10
4
3
Callachan
AM
83
0.00
0.01
0
0.00
2
6
Hungbo
LW
90
0.02
0.23
1
0.08
4
1
White
ST
83
1
1
0.69
0.03
1
0.06
1
0
Samuel
FW
33
0.00
0.01
0
0.06
2
0
Watson
DF
25
0.29
0.01
0
0.03
4
1
Burroughs
DF
7
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
0
2
Wright
FW
7
1
0.27
0.00
0
−0.01
0
0
Rangers
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
McGregor
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
1
0
Tavernier
RB
90
1
0.65
0.54
2
0.31
17
5
Goldson
CB
90
1
0.46
0.02
3
0.16
13
4
Bassey
CB
90
0.00
0.02
0
0.04
4
3
Barisic
LB
90
0.00
0.19
4
0.16
9
5
Arfield
CM
90
0.37
0.12
2
0.08
5
0
Kamara
CM
90
0.02
0.09
1
0.20
8
4
Aribo
CM
90
1
0.05
0.86
2
0.50
5
2
Amad
RW
66
1
0.97
0.11
1
0.21
6
0
Itten
ST
59
0.30
0.07
2
−0.24
0
0
Kent
LW
90
1
0.02
0.08
3
0.12
10
3
Roofe
FW
31
0.09
0.02
1
0.00
0
0
Sakala
FW
24
0.29
0.01
0
0.03
5
2
Lundstram
MF
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
0
1
Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.
Pass networks
Ross County
Rangers
Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.
Passing combinations
Ross County
From
To
Passes
Maynard-Brewer
White
8
Vokins
Hungbo
6
Iacovitti
Callachan
4
White
Callachan
4
Charles-Cook
Tillson
4
Rangers
From
To
Passes
Bassey
Goldson
39
Goldson
Bassey
32
Goldson
Tavernier
23
Bassey
Barisic
23
Barisic
Bassey
15
The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.
Defensive actions
Ross County
Against its average of 22 matches
Rangers
Against its average of 22 matches
Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.
Threat
Ross County
Rangers
Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.
Ratings
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.
League probabilities
Chance
Before
With this result
Change
Ross County
Top six
3%
3%
0
11th
18%
16%
−2
Bottom
8%
6%
−2
Rangers
Title
58%
50%
−8
Celtic
Title
42%
50%
+8
From the forecast before the match (29 January 2022): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.
Pre-match
As things stood before kick-off.
Forecast
Measure
Ross County
Rangers
Expected goals
0.70
2.24
Win
10%
72%
Expected Points
0.48
2.34
Clean sheet
11%
50%
Ross County 10%Draw 18%Rangers 72%
Most likely score 0–2, 13%. Both sides score 46%.
From the forecast as it stood on 29 January 2022: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.
League probabilities by result
Chance
Now
Ross County win
Draw
Rangers win
Ross County
Top six
3%
9%
3%
2%
11th
18%
11%
16%
19%
Bottom
8%
3%
6%
9%
Rangers
Title
58%
45%
50%
61%
Celtic
Title
42%
55%
50%
39%
Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.
The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.
Season to date
Measure
Ross County
Rangers
Position
10th
1st
Played
22
22
Won, drawn, lost
5–6–11
17–4–1
Points
21 (0.95 per game)
55 (2.50 per game)
Expected Points per game
1.22
2.22
Goals
31–38
45–15
xG per game
1.13–1.45
1.94–0.64
Home: points, xG per game
1.20, 1.32–1.29
2.50, 2.04–0.46
Away: points, xG per game
0.75, 0.97–1.58
2.50, 1.82–0.85
Manager
Malky Mackay (22)
Giovanni van Bronckhorst (9)
League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.
Ratings
This season
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.
Strengths and weaknesses
Chances
Ross County
Rangers
Created
Conceded
Created
Conceded
Open play
−8%
+20%
+69%
−50%
Counter-attacks
−48%
+31%
+15%
−90%
Set pieces
−20%
+45%
+48%
−49%
Penalties
+67%
−33%
+67%
average
Headers
−41%
+67%
+55%
−47%
Left side
−16%
+37%
+30%
−43%
Centre
−17%
+25%
+52%
−56%
Right side
−2%
+18%
+105%
−50%
xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.
Matchups
Ross County attacking
Ross County createdRangers concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−16%−50%Centre−17%−56%Right side−2%−43%Open play−8%−50%Counter-attacks−48%−90%Set pieces−20%−49%Headers−41%−47%
Rangers attacking
Rangers createdRoss County concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side+30%+18%Centre+52%+25%Right side+105%+37%Open play+69%+20%Counter-attacks+15%+31%Set pieces+48%+45%Headers+55%+67%
Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.
Season averages
Ross CountyRangers
1.13xG1.94
1.45xG against0.64
42%Possession64%
10.7Shots19.1
15.5Shots against6.6
4.1Shots on target6.6
1.5Big chances2.3
17.5Touches in the opposition box36.2
312Passes554
65%Pass accuracy84%
4.0Corners8.3
40%Field tilt76%
28.3Final-third entries57.0
8.5Box entries19.7
16.8Passes per defensive action12.1
Per league match this season before kick-off.
Game state this season
Ross County
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
46
0.90
1.39
Ahead
15
1.58
1.44
Behind
29
1.25
1.55
Rangers
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
35
1.83
0.63
Ahead
44
1.93
0.73
Behind
11
2.28
0.29
xG by period
Ross County
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.08
0.17
3–6
16–30
0.21
0.21
4–7
31–45
0.18
0.22
9–8
46–60
0.08
0.20
2–5
61–75
0.23
0.30
8–4
76–90
0.34
0.35
5–8
Rangers
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.25
0.12
7–5
16–30
0.28
0.08
8–2
31–45
0.31
0.09
7–1
46–60
0.34
0.07
7–1
61–75
0.25
0.14
6–3
76–90
0.49
0.13
10–3
Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.
This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.