Wednesday 9 February 2022, 19:45 · Global Energy Stadium · Round 26 · Half-time 0–0 · Referee David Munro · Attendance 2,224
Ross County Ramsay 90+3'
Livingston Forrest 50'
Post-match
Result and Expected Points
Measure
Ross County
Livingston
Goals
1
1
xG
0.48
1.75
Non-penalty xG
0.48
0.96
Expected Points
0.38
2.42
Ross County 6%Draw 20%Livingston 74%
Most likely score 0–1, 21%. Final score 1–1, 13%.
Own goals have no xG.
xG race
Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Stoppage time is shaded as far as the last shot or event recorded in it. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.
Match stats
Ross CountyLivingston
0.48 −0.66xG1.75 +0.93
0.48Non-penalty xG0.96
0.56 −0.77xG on target1.11 +0.31
9 −1.3Shots17 +7.9
4 −0.1Shots on target4 +0.9
0 −1.6Big chances2 +1.1
13 −4Touches in the opposition box22 +7
55% +13Possession45% +6
409 +101Passes335 +36
67% +2Pass accuracy62% 0
50% +10Field tilt50% +12
44 +15Final-third entries30 +6
6 −2.4Box entries14 +6.3
12.4 −4Passes per defensive action17.4 +1
8 +4.0Corners6 +2.4
17 +4Tackles14 −2
10 0Interceptions5 −6
23 −4Clearances28 +5
3 −0.7Saves3 −0.2
12 −1Fouls11 −3
1 −1.2Offsides3 +0.6
The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.
Chance locations
Ross County
Livingston
Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.
xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.
Game state
50'90+3'
0–00–1
0'HTFT
Level
51 min (54%) · Ross County 0.19, Livingston 0.33 xG
Livingston ahead
43 min (46%) · Ross County 0.29, Livingston 1.42 xG
Line-ups
Ross County substitutes
62'H. Paton for Hungbo
77'Baldwin for Iacovitti
83'Ramsay for Randall · goal 90+3'
83'Wright for Tillson
Livingston substitutes
64'Anderson for Bailey · yellow card 90+3'
80'Shinnie for Forrest
90'Boyes for Nouble
Players
Ross County
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Laidlaw
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
0
0
Randall
RB
83
0.00
0.01
0
0.04
5
4
Watson
CB
90
0.00
0.02
0
0.09
6
5
Iacovitti
CB
77
0.10
0.01
0
0.10
13
3
Vokins
LB
90
0.03
0.04
1
0.15
6
5
Spittal
DM
90
1
0.06
0.31
2
0.28
6
13
Tillson
DM
83
0.03
0.01
0
−0.01
2
5
Charles-Cook
RW
90
0.01
0.01
0
0.00
5
2
Callachan
AM
90
0.02
0.07
2
−0.03
0
7
Hungbo
LW
62
0.00
0.01
0
0.01
5
2
White
ST
90
0.04
0.02
2
0.01
1
1
H. Paton
MF
28
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
6
Baldwin
DF
13
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
1
1
Ramsay
DF
7
1
0.19
0.00
0
0.00
0
1
Wright
FW
7
0.00
0.00
0
−0.01
0
0
Livingston
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Stryjek
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.03
4
1
Devlin
RB
90
0.15
0.02
2
0.19
4
4
Fitzwater
CB
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.06
5
9
Obileye
CB
90
0.80
0.00
0
0.04
2
5
Penrice
LB
90
0.00
0.10
1
0.14
4
7
Pittman
CM
90
1
0.03
0.03
1
−0.01
1
5
Holt
CM
90
0.01
0.07
2
0.02
3
7
Omeonga
CM
90
0.03
0.00
2
0.05
4
3
Bailey
RW
64
0.07
0.03
0
0.01
3
2
Nouble
ST
90
0.09
0.23
2
0.18
5
4
Forrest
LW
80
1
0.26
0.06
2
0.09
8
1
Anderson
FW
26
0.30
0.01
1
0.06
1
0
Shinnie
FW
10
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
1
Boyes
DF
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.
Pass networks
Ross County
Livingston
Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.
Passing combinations
Ross County
From
To
Passes
Randall
Watson
13
Watson
Randall
13
Iacovitti
White
8
Watson
Iacovitti
7
Vokins
Callachan
7
Livingston
From
To
Passes
Fitzwater
Obileye
8
Penrice
Forrest
7
Devlin
Omeonga
7
Penrice
Nouble
7
Forrest
Penrice
6
The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.
Defensive actions
Ross County
Against its average of 25 matches
Livingston
Against its average of 25 matches
Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.
Threat
Ross County
Livingston
Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.
Ratings
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.
League probabilities
Chance
Before
With this result
Change
Ross County
Top six
7%
5%
−2
11th
12%
14%
+2
Bottom
2%
2%
0
Livingston
Top six
34%
31%
−3
11th
3%
2%
−1
Bottom
<1%
<1%
0
Dundee United
Top six
28%
30%
+2
11th
4%
4%
0
St. Mirren
Top six
29%
30%
+1
Bottom
1%
1%
0
From the forecast before the match (9 February 2022): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.
Pre-match
As things stood before kick-off.
Forecast
Measure
Ross County
Livingston
Expected goals
1.29
1.14
Win
39%
32%
Expected Points
1.47
1.24
Clean sheet
32%
27%
Ross County 39%Draw 29%Livingston 32%
Most likely score 1–1, 14%. Both sides score 50%.
From the forecast as it stood on 9 February 2022: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.
League probabilities by result
Chance
Now
Ross County win
Draw
Livingston win
Ross County
Top six
7%
13%
5%
2%
11th
12%
7%
14%
17%
Bottom
2%
1%
2%
4%
Livingston
Top six
34%
20%
31%
52%
11th
3%
5%
2%
1%
Bottom
<1%
1%
<1%
<1%
Dundee United
Top six
28%
30%
30%
25%
11th
4%
4%
4%
4%
St. Mirren
Top six
29%
31%
30%
26%
Bottom
1%
<1%
1%
1%
Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.
The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.
Season to date
Measure
Ross County
Livingston
Position
10th
8th
Played
25
25
Won, drawn, lost
6–8–11
8–5–12
Points
26 (1.04 per game)
29 (1.16 per game)
Expected Points per game
1.20
1.00
Goals
37–43
24–32
xG per game
1.14–1.48
0.82–1.32
Home: points, xG per game
1.17, 1.26–1.40
1.17, 1.02–1.22
Away: points, xG per game
0.92, 1.03–1.55
1.15, 0.63–1.42
Manager
Malky Mackay (25)
David Martindale (48)
League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.
Ratings
This season
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.
Strengths and weaknesses
Chances
Ross County
Livingston
Created
Conceded
Created
Conceded
Open play
−9%
+22%
−35%
+4%
Counter-attacks
−56%
+44%
−35%
−5%
Set pieces
−20%
+41%
−11%
+13%
Penalties
+92%
−36%
−68%
+60%
Headers
−41%
+61%
−27%
+7%
Left side
−10%
+47%
−5%
−1%
Centre
−19%
+24%
−33%
+2%
Right side
−7%
+14%
−41%
+21%
xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.
Matchups
Ross County attacking
Ross County createdLivingston concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−10%+21%Centre−19%+2%Right side−7%−1%Open play−9%+4%Counter-attacks−56%−5%Set pieces−20%+13%Headers−41%+7%
Livingston attacking
Livingston createdRoss County concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−5%+14%Centre−33%+24%Right side−41%+47%Open play−35%+22%Counter-attacks−35%+44%Set pieces−11%+41%Headers−27%+61%
Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.
Season averages
Ross CountyLivingston
1.14xG0.82
1.48xG against1.32
42%Possession39%
10.3Shots9.1
15.8Shots against14.1
4.1Shots on target3.1
1.6Big chances0.9
17.1Touches in the opposition box15.1
308Passes299
65%Pass accuracy62%
4.0Corners3.6
40%Field tilt37%
28.7Final-third entries23.9
8.4Box entries7.7
16.6Passes per defensive action16.1
Per league match this season before kick-off.
Game state this season
Ross County
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
48
0.92
1.42
Ahead
14
1.48
1.53
Behind
28
1.34
1.55
Livingston
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
44
0.82
1.09
Ahead
18
0.75
1.68
Behind
27
0.85
1.47
xG by period
Ross County
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.07
0.19
3–7
16–30
0.23
0.20
6–8
31–45
0.18
0.23
10–8
46–60
0.12
0.22
3–7
61–75
0.21
0.30
8–5
76–90
0.34
0.33
7–8
Livingston
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.10
0.18
2–6
16–30
0.15
0.16
5–4
31–45
0.17
0.19
6–4
46–60
0.13
0.19
5–4
61–75
0.15
0.21
2–7
76–90
0.12
0.40
4–7
Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.
This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.