Friday 6 November 2020, 19:45 · Global Energy Stadium · Round 14 · Half-time 1–0 · Attendance 300
Ross County Shaw 28'
Livingston Devlin 56'
Post-match
Result and Expected Points
Measure
Ross County
Livingston
Goals
1
1
xG
0.62
1.07
Expected Points
0.89
1.76
Ross County 18%Draw 35%Livingston 47%
Most likely score 0–1, 22%. Final score 1–1, 18%.
Own goals have no xG.
xG race
Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.
Match stats
Ross CountyLivingston
0.62 −0.44xG1.07 −0.28
0.62 +0.03xG on target0.76 −0.34
7 −3Shots7 −4
2 −0.8Shots on target2 −0.8
1 −0.3Big chances2 +0.5
11 −7Touches in the opposition box19 −2
56% +8Possession44% −5
426 +30Passes336 −15
63% −9Pass accuracy58% −5
50% +1Field tilt50% −2
40 +1Final-third entries35 0
5 −3.1Box entries8 −1.8
19.5 +5Passes per defensive action8.7 −4
3 −0.9Corners3 −2.7
9 −4Tackles21 +6
7 −3Interceptions22 +11
26 +2Clearances16 −4
1 −1.8Saves1 −1.2
10 −5Fouls13 −2
3 +1.6Offsides2 +0.3
The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.
Chance locations
Ross County
Livingston
Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.
xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.
Game state
28'56'
0–01–01–1
0'HTFT
Level
62 min (69%) · Ross County 0.44, Livingston 0.58 xG
Ross County ahead
28 min (31%) · Ross County 0.17, Livingston 0.48 xG
Line-ups
Ross County substitutes
59'Charles-Cook for Gardyne
85'Tillson for Lakin
Livingston substitutes
77'Poplatnik for Sibbald
81'Ambrose for Brown
Players
Ross County
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Doohan
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
2
0
Grivosti
RB
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.05
5
5
Donaldson
CB
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.06
7
8
Iacovitti
CB
90
0.05
0.00
0
0.07
8
3
Reid
LB
90
0.00
0.11
1
0.25
11
5
Gardyne
RM
59
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
3
0
Paton
CM
90
0.00
0.02
0
0.06
10
2
Lakin
CM
85
0.00
0.08
1
0.05
4
5
Kelly
CM
90
1
0.10
0.10
1
0.06
3
7
Stewart
LM
90
0.11
0.02
1
0.00
2
4
Shaw
ST
90
1
0.33
0.23
1
0.14
3
1
Charles-Cook
FW
31
0.03
0.01
0
0.01
3
1
Tillson
MF
5
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
1
Livingston
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Stryjek
GK
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.06
6
0
Devlin
RB
90
1
0.45
0.02
0
0.08
8
10
Brown
CB
81
0.00
0.05
1
0.02
1
9
Guthrie
CB
90
0.07
0.01
0
0.06
4
9
Lawson
LB
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.04
4
9
Pittman
CM
90
1
0.09
0.10
1
0.16
3
1
Bartley
CM
90
0.00
0.02
1
0.01
3
7
Robinson
CM
90
0.00
0.17
0
0.07
0
6
Sibbald
RW
77
0.03
0.03
0
0.04
5
3
Emmanuel-Thomas
ST
90
0.39
0.07
1
0.06
2
1
Forrest
LW
90
0.04
0.21
2
0.02
1
4
Poplatnik
FW
13
0.00
0.01
0
−0.03
0
0
Ambrose
FW
9
0.00
0.01
0
0.03
2
1
Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.
Pass networks
Ross County
Livingston
Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.
Passing combinations
Ross County
From
To
Passes
Reid
Lakin
10
Reid
Paton
9
Reid
Stewart
8
Grivosti
Paton
6
Reid
Gardyne
6
Livingston
From
To
Passes
Stryjek
Emmanuel-Thomas
9
Devlin
Emmanuel-Thomas
8
Devlin
Sibbald
6
Lawson
Guthrie
5
Lawson
Stryjek
5
The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.
Defensive actions
Ross County
Against its average of 13 matches
Livingston
Against its average of 13 matches
Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.
Threat
Ross County
Livingston
Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.
Ratings
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.
League probabilities
Chance
Before
With this result
Change
Ross County
Top six
4%
4%
0
11th
26%
25%
−1
Bottom
20%
19%
−1
Livingston
Top six
26%
21%
−5
11th
7%
9%
+2
Bottom
3%
3%
0
Hamilton Academical
11th
24%
23%
−1
Bottom
49%
51%
+2
Dundee United
Top six
30%
31%
+1
11th
6%
6%
0
From the forecast before the match (6 November 2020): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.
Pre-match
As things stood before kick-off.
Forecast
Measure
Ross County
Livingston
Expected goals
1.01
1.53
Win
24%
49%
Expected Points
1.00
1.73
Clean sheet
22%
36%
Ross County 24%Draw 27%Livingston 49%
Most likely score 1–1, 13%. Both sides score 50%.
From the forecast as it stood on 6 November 2020: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.
League probabilities by result
Chance
Now
Ross County win
Draw
Livingston win
Ross County
Top six
4%
7%
4%
2%
11th
26%
20%
25%
30%
Bottom
20%
13%
19%
25%
Livingston
Top six
26%
16%
21%
34%
11th
7%
11%
9%
4%
Bottom
3%
5%
3%
1%
Hamilton Academical
11th
24%
23%
23%
26%
Bottom
49%
51%
51%
47%
Dundee United
Top six
30%
32%
31%
28%
11th
6%
7%
6%
5%
Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.
The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.
Season to date
Measure
Ross County
Livingston
Position
8th
10th
Played
13
13
Won, drawn, lost
3–3–7
3–2–8
Points
12 (0.92 per game)
11 (0.85 per game)
Expected Points per game
0.89
1.30
Goals
8–22
13–22
xG per game
1.06–1.88
1.35–1.35
Home: points, xG per game
0.83, 1.11–2.27
1.00, 1.14–1.55
Away: points, xG per game
1.00, 1.02–1.55
0.67, 1.58–1.12
Manager
Stuart Kettlewell (13)
Gary Holt (13)
League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.
Ratings
This season
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.
Strengths and weaknesses
Chances
Ross County
Livingston
Created
Conceded
Created
Conceded
Open play
−19%
+29%
+3%
−13%
Counter-attacks
−100%
−34%
−100%
−57%
Set pieces
−19%
+12%
−4%
+31%
Penalties
−30%
+147%
+6%
+6%
Headers
+6%
+1%
+2%
+11%
Left side
−16%
+30%
−32%
−33%
Centre
−35%
+28%
+30%
+20%
Right side
−2%
+3%
−29%
−10%
xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.
Matchups
Ross County attacking
Ross County createdLivingston concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−16%−10%Centre−35%+20%Right side−2%−33%Open play−19%−13%Counter-attacks−100%−57%Set pieces−19%+31%Headers+6%+11%
Livingston attacking
Livingston createdRoss County concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−32%+3%Centre+30%+28%Right side−29%+30%Open play+3%+29%Counter-attacks−100%−34%Set pieces−4%+12%Headers+2%+1%
Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.
Season averages
Ross CountyLivingston
1.06xG1.35
1.88xG against1.35
48%Possession49%
10.2Shots10.9
13.9Shots against10.7
2.8Shots on target2.8
1.3Big chances1.5
17.6Touches in the opposition box21.2
396Passes351
72%Pass accuracy63%
3.9Corners5.7
49%Field tilt52%
39.4Final-third entries35.1
8.1Box entries9.8
14.1Passes per defensive action12.5
Per league match this season before kick-off.
Game state this season
Ross County
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
42
1.05
1.79
Ahead
14
0.37
1.67
Behind
34
1.37
2.09
Livingston
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
39
1.14
1.33
Ahead
12
1.09
1.27
Behind
40
1.62
1.41
xG by period
Ross County
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.16
0.35
1–2
16–30
0.15
0.24
2–3
31–45
0.17
0.25
1–3
46–60
0.17
0.33
0–5
61–75
0.17
0.42
1–6
76–90
0.24
0.29
3–3
Livingston
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.21
0.13
3–2
16–30
0.26
0.32
1–8
31–45
0.17
0.31
2–5
46–60
0.19
0.21
2–5
61–75
0.26
0.19
3–0
76–90
0.26
0.21
2–2
Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.
This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.