Saturday 24 February 2024, 15:00 · Global Energy Stadium · Round 27 · Half-time 2–0 · Referee David Dickinson · Attendance 3,506
Ross County Brophy 21', 27', Sims 90+2'
Livingston Anderson 47', 86'
Post-match
Result and Expected Points
Measure
Ross County
Livingston
Goals
3
2
xG
1.06
1.13
Expected Points
1.30
1.38
Ross County 32%Draw 33%Livingston 35%
Most likely score 1–1, 18%. Final score 3–2, 1%.
Own goals have no xG.
xG race
Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Stoppage time is shaded as far as the last shot or event recorded in it. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.
Match stats
Ross CountyLivingston
1.06 +0.21xG1.13 +0.16
1.77 +0.95xG on target1.18 +0.39
13 +2.9Shots18 +9.0
6 +2.8Shots on target6 +3.8
1 −0.4Big chances0 −1.3
15 −2Touches in the opposition box28 +11
52% +8Possession48% +4
324 −16Passes304 −22
69% +3Pass accuracy63% +1
51% +7Field tilt49% +7
40 +9Final-third entries22 −6
6 −3.2Box entries9 +1.6
10.5 −4Passes per defensive action11.3 −3
6 +1.2Corners4 +0.6
11 −3Tackles29 +13
12 +2.7Interceptions4 −3.2
32 +6Clearances14 −10
4 −0.2Saves3 +0.1
11 −2Fouls15 +3
0 −1.6Offsides1 −0.9
The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.
Chance locations
Ross County
Livingston
Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.
xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.
Game state
21'27'47'86'90+2'
0–02–02–1
0'HTFT
Level
27 min (28%) · Ross County 0.84, Livingston 0.19 xG
Ross County ahead
68 min (72%) · Ross County 0.22, Livingston 0.94 xG
Line-ups
Ross County substitutes
68'King for Jenks
77'Sims for Brophy · goal 90+2'
87'Brown for Loturi
Livingston substitutes
46'Anderson for Stephen Kelly · goal 47', goal 86'
46'Mackay for Shinnie
59'Sean Kelly for Sangare
83'Guthrie for Brandon
Players
Ross County
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Wickens
GK
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.06
3
1
Ayina
CB
90
0.00
0.02
1
0.04
7
15
Leak
CB
90
0.02
0.01
0
0.09
7
12
Efete
CB
90
0.00
0.05
1
0.07
10
7
Jenks
RWB
68
0.04
0.00
0
−0.01
0
4
Loturi
CM
87
0.01
0.01
1
0.01
5
6
Sheaf
CM
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.07
6
1
Reid
LWB
90
0.00
0.02
2
0.03
3
6
Brophy
AM
77
2
0.57
0.06
1
0.12
5
0
Murray
AM
90
2
0.04
0.53
3
0.06
5
1
White
ST
90
1
0.20
0.03
1
0.01
3
8
King
MF
22
0.00
0.12
0
0.00
0
0
Sims
FW
13
1
0.18
0.00
0
0.02
1
1
Brown
MF
3
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
1
0
Livingston
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
George
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
1
2
Brandon
RB
83
0.05
0.02
1
0.12
10
8
Nottingham
CB
90
0.03
0.07
2
0.05
6
5
Obileye
CB
90
0.00
0.10
0
0.12
5
5
Sangare
LB
59
0.01
0.05
0
0.01
2
6
Carson
DM
90
0.01
0.01
0
0.03
2
4
Holt
DM
90
0.28
0.32
2
0.32
3
3
Nouble
RW
90
0.00
0.03
0
0.02
2
3
Shinnie
AM
46
0.11
0.00
1
−0.01
0
2
Stephen Kelly
LW
46
0.00
0.05
1
0.05
0
1
Yengi
ST
90
1
0.47
0.12
2
−0.05
1
4
Anderson
FW
44
2
0.14
0.02
0
0.05
0
0
Mackay
FW
44
0.00
0.00
0
−0.04
1
2
Sean Kelly
DF
31
0.00
0.12
1
0.03
4
2
Guthrie
FW
7
0.02
0.05
0
0.04
1
0
Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.
Pass networks
Ross County
Livingston
Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.
Passing combinations
Ross County
From
To
Passes
Efete
Sheaf
14
Efete
Brophy
11
Efete
Loturi
7
Loturi
Efete
7
Ayina
Efete
6
Livingston
From
To
Passes
Brandon
Nouble
6
Holt
Brandon
6
Brandon
Mackay
5
Sean Kelly
Yengi
5
Nottingham
Sangare
4
The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.
Defensive actions
Ross County
Against its average of 25 matches
Livingston
Against its average of 26 matches
Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.
Threat
Ross County
Livingston
Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.
Ratings
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.
League probabilities
Chance
Before
With this result
Change
Ross County
11th
41%
46%
+5
Bottom
33%
17%
−16
Livingston
11th
28%
18%
−10
Bottom
58%
75%
+17
St. Johnstone
11th
22%
25%
+3
Bottom
7%
7%
0
From the forecast before the match (24 February 2024): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.
Pre-match
As things stood before kick-off.
Forecast
Measure
Ross County
Livingston
Expected goals
1.21
1.11
Win
38%
33%
Expected Points
1.43
1.27
Clean sheet
33%
30%
Ross County 38%Draw 30%Livingston 33%
Most likely score 1–1, 14%. Both sides score 48%.
From the forecast as it stood on 24 February 2024: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.
League probabilities by result
Chance
Now
Ross County win
Draw
Livingston win
Ross County
11th
41%
46%
43%
32%
Bottom
33%
17%
34%
52%
Livingston
11th
28%
18%
30%
39%
Bottom
58%
75%
58%
38%
St. Johnstone
11th
22%
25%
20%
20%
Bottom
7%
7%
7%
8%
Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.
The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.
Season to date
Measure
Ross County
Livingston
Position
11th
12th
Played
25
26
Won, drawn, lost
4–7–14
3–7–16
Points
19 (0.76 per game)
16 (0.62 per game)
Expected Points per game
0.90
1.22
Goals
20–43
16–42
xG per game
0.85–1.68
0.97–1.34
Home: points, xG per game
1.00, 0.84–1.25
0.85, 1.20–1.23
Away: points, xG per game
0.57, 0.85–2.02
0.38, 0.74–1.45
Manager
Don Cowie (2)
David Martindale (125)
League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.
Ratings
This season
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.
Strengths and weaknesses
Chances
Ross County
Livingston
Created
Conceded
Created
Conceded
Open play
−24%
+33%
−46%
−3%
Counter-attacks
−59%
+69%
−19%
−17%
Set pieces
−34%
−1%
−21%
+8%
Penalties
−100%
+1%
+36%
−3%
Headers
−17%
−7%
−27%
−18%
Left side
−20%
+24%
−44%
+4%
Centre
−38%
+39%
−27%
−6%
Right side
−22%
+6%
−50%
+3%
xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.
Matchups
Ross County attacking
Ross County createdLivingston concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−20%+3%Centre−38%−6%Right side−22%+4%Open play−24%−3%Counter-attacks−59%−17%Set pieces−34%+8%Headers−17%−18%
Livingston attacking
Livingston createdRoss County concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−44%+6%Centre−27%+39%Right side−50%+24%Open play−46%+33%Counter-attacks−19%+69%Set pieces−21%−1%Headers−27%−7%
Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.
Season averages
Ross CountyLivingston
0.85xG0.97
1.68xG against1.34
44%Possession44%
10.1Shots9.0
16.1Shots against13.4
3.2Shots on target2.2
1.4Big chances1.3
17.2Touches in the opposition box16.6
340Passes326
66%Pass accuracy62%
4.8Corners3.4
44%Field tilt42%
31.2Final-third entries27.5
9.2Box entries7.4
14.9Passes per defensive action14.5
Per league match this season before kick-off.
Game state this season
Ross County
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
48
0.87
1.27
Ahead
10
1.38
1.97
Behind
31
0.62
2.23
Livingston
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
52
0.82
1.21
Ahead
7
1.21
1.51
Behind
31
1.16
1.51
xG by period
Ross County
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.13
0.15
1–3
16–30
0.15
0.28
3–8
31–45
0.13
0.40
1–9
46–60
0.15
0.22
6–5
61–75
0.12
0.25
4–6
76–90
0.17
0.39
5–12
Livingston
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.07
0.21
1–3
16–30
0.08
0.15
2–6
31–45
0.19
0.14
3–7
46–60
0.13
0.30
2–8
61–75
0.17
0.18
4–5
76–90
0.33
0.36
4–13
Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.
This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.