Digressive Celts

Matches › 2020/21

Rangers 1–0 Kilmarnock

Saturday 13 February 2021, 15:00 · Ibrox Stadium · Round 29 · Half-time 1–0

Rangers Jack 38'

Post-match

Result and Expected Points

RangersKilmarnock
Goals10
xG1.470.08
Expected Points2.580.23

Rangers 80%Draw 19%Kilmarnock 1%

Most likely score 1–0, 36%. Final score 1–0, 36%.

Kilmarnock goalsRangers goals0123456+0123456+16%1%3%2%10%2%36%28%Final score

Own goals have no xG.

xG race

00.511.520153045607590HTWright on for Hagi, 79'Arfield on for Kent, 88'Burke on for Dicker, 64'Whitehall on for McKenzie, 79'Dabo on for Tshibola, 80'Jack 38'Rangers 1.47Kilmarnock 0.0800.511.520153045607590HTWright on for Hagi, 79'Arfield on for Kent, 88'Burke on for Dicker, 64'Whitehall on for McKenzie, 79'Dabo on for Tshibola, 80'Jack 38'1.470.08RangersKilmarnock

Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.

Match stats

RangersKilmarnock

1.47 −0.67xG0.08 −0.93
1.38 −0.56xG on target0.00 −0.94
13 −4Shots2 −8
6 +0.1Shots on target0 −3.0
2 −0.8Big chances0 −1.0
31 −1Touches in the opposition box10 −9
63% −4Possession37% −9
550 −66Passes329 −34
80% −4Pass accuracy66% −2
68% −11Field tilt32% −16
68 +9Final-third entries23 −14
16 −2.2Box entries4 −5.8
10.3 0Passes per defensive action14.4 0
10 +3.3Corners3 −1.9
14 0Tackles15 +2
12 +3.0Interceptions13 +1.8
13 +1Clearances26 +9
0 −1.7Saves5 +2.7
16 +5Fouls16 +4
5 +3.4Offsides0 −2.2

The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.

Chance locations

Rangers

Aribo 84', 0.59 xGTavernier 43', 0.31 xGBalogun 37', 0.09 xGKent 46', 0.09 xGHagi 27', 0.06 xGAribo 57', 0.06 xGKent 50', 0.05 xGItten 63', 0.05 xGDavis 29', 0.04 xGKent 41', 0.04 xGHagi 4', 0.03 xGTavernier 77', 0.02 xGJack 38', 0.03 xG, goal0%0.00 xGSix-yard box: 0 shots, 0.00 xG, 0 goals72%1.05 xGCentral box: 4 shots, 1.05 xG, 0 goals15%0.22 xGWide in the box: 4 shots, 0.22 xG, 0 goals10%0.14 xGEdge of the box: 3 shots, 0.14 xG, 1 goal3%0.05 xGFurther out: 2 shots, 0.05 xG, 0 goals

Kilmarnock

Kiltie 11', 0.04 xGHaunstrup 31', 0.04 xG0%0.00 xGSix-yard box: 0 shots, 0.00 xG, 0 goals0%0.00 xGCentral box: 0 shots, 0.00 xG, 0 goals100%0.08 xGWide in the box: 2 shots, 0.08 xG, 0 goals0%0.00 xGEdge of the box: 0 shots, 0.00 xG, 0 goals0%0.00 xGFurther out: 0 shots, 0.00 xG, 0 goals

Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.

Chance types

RangersKilmarnock

0.63 7 shots, 0 goalsOpen play0.08 2 shots, 0 goals
0.59 1 shot, 0 goalsCounter-attacks0.00 0 shots, 0 goals
0.24 5 shots, 1 goalSet pieces0.00 0 shots, 0 goals

xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.

Game state

Level
38 min (42%) · Rangers 0.24, Kilmarnock 0.08 xG
Rangers ahead
52 min (58%) · Rangers 1.22, Kilmarnock 0.00 xG

Line-ups

12626311781071114McGregorTavernierGoldsonBalogunBarisicAriboJackDavisHagiIttenKentGoal79'88'Rangers 4-3-3Steven Gerrard16242432782110117DoyleMcGowanDikamonaMedleyHaunstrupTshibolaDickerMulumbuKiltieKabambaMcKenzieYellow cardYellow card80'64'79'Kilmarnock 4-3-3Tommy Wright

Rangers substitutes

  • 79' Wright for Hagi
  • 88' Arfield for Kent

Kilmarnock substitutes

  • 64' Burke for Dicker
  • 79' Whitehall for McKenzie
  • 80' Dabo for Tshibola

Players

Rangers

PlayerPosMinGAxGxAKPxTProgDef
McGregorGK900.000.0000.0100
TavernierRB900.330.1200.1197
GoldsonCB900.000.0100.0965
BalogunCB900.090.0000.0528
BarisicLB900.000.0400.0465
AriboCM900.660.0510.11108
JackCM9010.030.0730.1594
DavisCM900.040.4300.2490
HagiRW790.090.0200.0222
IttenST900.050.1020.2052
KentLW880.180.1710.1550
WrightFW110.000.0100.0240
ArfieldMF20.000.0000.0000

Kilmarnock

PlayerPosMinGAxGxAKPxTProgDef
DoyleGK900.000.0000.0330
McGowanRB900.000.0100.0234
DikamonaCB900.000.0000.0229
MedleyCB900.000.0000.03310
HaunstrupLB900.040.0210.0958
Tshibola CM800.000.0100.0105
DickerCM640.000.0000.0103
MulumbuCM900.000.0610.1422
KiltieRW900.040.0400.0333
KabambaST900.000.000−0.0103
McKenzie LW790.000.0000.0128
BurkeMF260.000.0100.0020
WhitehallFW110.000.000−0.0100
DaboMF100.000.0000.0013

Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.

Pass networks

Rangers

Aribo and Davis: 6 passesDavis and Itten: 6 passesBarisic and Kent: 7 passesTavernier and Itten: 8 passesBalogun and Davis: 9 passesMcGregor and Goldson: 10 passesTavernier and Hagi: 10 passesDavis and Hagi: 10 passesBalogun and Aribo: 12 passesAribo and Kent: 13 passesJack and Kent: 13 passesGoldson and Jack: 15 passesGoldson and Davis: 15 passesBarisic and Davis: 15 passesAribo and Jack: 15 passesJack and Hagi: 16 passesBarisic and Aribo: 18 passesTavernier and Davis: 19 passesDavis and Kent: 19 passesBalogun and Barisic: 20 passesTavernier and Goldson: 24 passesTavernier and Jack: 24 passesBalogun and Goldson: 27 passesJack and Davis: 29 passesMcGregor: 14 completed passesTavernier: 54 completed passesBalogun: 44 completed passesGoldson: 52 completed passesBarisic: 37 completed passesAribo: 39 completed passesJack: 63 completed passesDavis: 69 completed passesHagi: 21 completed passesItten: 9 completed passesKent: 29 completed passes12266311781071114McGregorTavernierBalogunGoldsonBarisicAriboJackDavisHagiIttenKentStarters until 79' · lines join pairs with 6+ passes

Kilmarnock

Doyle and Kabamba: 3 passesMedley and Dicker: 3 passesMulumbu and Kiltie: 3 passesMulumbu and Kabamba: 3 passesMulumbu and McKenzie: 3 passesDicker and Tshibola: 3 passesDicker and McKenzie: 3 passesTshibola and Kabamba: 3 passesDoyle and Medley: 4 passesMcGowan and Tshibola: 4 passesHaunstrup and McKenzie: 5 passesHaunstrup and Dicker: 6 passesMulumbu and Dicker: 6 passesMcGowan and Mulumbu: 7 passesMedley and Haunstrup: 7 passesMulumbu and Tshibola: 7 passesTshibola and Kiltie: 7 passesHaunstrup and Mulumbu: 9 passesDoyle: 11 completed passesMcGowan: 12 completed passesDikamona: 4 completed passesMedley: 10 completed passesHaunstrup: 15 completed passesMulumbu: 20 completed passesDicker: 12 completed passesTshibola: 14 completed passesKiltie: 10 completed passesKabamba: 4 completed passesMcKenzie: 4 completed passes16242432182710117DoyleMcGowanDikamonaMedleyHaunstrupMulumbuDickerTshibolaKiltieKabambaMcKenzieStarters until 64' · lines join pairs with 3+ passes

Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.

Passing combinations

Rangers

FromToPasses
DavisJack15
BalogunGoldson15
JackDavis14
TavernierGoldson14
JackAribo13

Kilmarnock

FromToPasses
HaunstrupMedley10
McGowanMulumbu9
MulumbuHaunstrup8
MulumbuTshibola6
TshibolaMulumbu6

The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.

Defensive actions

Rangers

4+0.26+2.85−2.17+2.46+1.611+3.57+0.95+1.57+1.411+4.07+0.77+1.65+1.53−1.49+3.67+2.26+1.51−1.42−1.86+1.01−2.33+0.60−1.220.04+1.62+0.91+0.63+2.21+0.44+3.0FewerMore than the season average

Against its average of 28 matches

Kilmarnock

9+5.65−1.127+14.012+4.86−0.610+3.89+1.93−3.490.080.06+2.04−1.62−2.04−0.83−2.44+0.56+2.63+0.33−0.33−0.93+0.91−0.82+0.54+2.620.00−0.80−0.31+0.20−0.41+0.4FewerMore than the season average

Against its average of 28 matches

Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.

Threat

Rangers

0.010.020.040.010.020.010.040.090.030.030.040.040.090.100.060.040.090.010.030.04−0.010.040.050.120.14LessMore

Kilmarnock

0.010.010.010.010.030.010.020.020.020.010.010.020.030.020.010.010.02−0.030.01−0.010.030.010.10LessMore

Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.

Ratings

0.51.01.52.0League average 1.18AttackRangers1.91 → 1.87Kilmarnock0.95 → 0.93Defence (lower is better)Rangers0.62 → 0.61Kilmarnock1.30 → 1.27

The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.

League probabilities

ChanceBeforeWith this resultChange
Kilmarnock
Top six<1%<1%0
11th21%22%+1
Bottom8%10%+2
Ross County
11th39%38%−1
Bottom38%37%−1
Hamilton Academical
11th31%30%−1
Bottom53%53%0

From the forecast before the match (13 February 2021): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.

Pre-match

As things stood before kick-off.

Forecast

RangersKilmarnock
Expected goals2.160.51
Win75%7%
Expected Points2.430.39
Clean sheet60%12%

Rangers 75%Draw 18%Kilmarnock 7%

Most likely score 2–0, 16%. Both sides score 36%.

Kilmarnock goalsRangers goals0123456+0123456+7%3%8%2%8%2%6%2%6%3%3%1%1%15%16%12%

From the forecast as it stood on 13 February 2021: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.

League probabilities by result

ChanceNowRangers winDrawKilmarnock win
Kilmarnock
Top six<1%<1%<1%1%
11th21%22%18%10%
Bottom8%10%6%3%
Ross County
11th39%38%41%42%
Bottom38%37%39%44%
Hamilton Academical
11th31%30%31%36%
Bottom53%53%53%52%

Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.

Form

Rangers

  1. D1–17 FebHamilton Academical (A)xG 0.74–1.37
  2. W1–03 FebSt. Johnstone (H)xG 1.33–0.27
  3. W1–027 JanHibernian (A)xG 1.72–0.80
  4. W5–023 JanRoss County (H)xG 2.67–0.50
  5. D1–117 JanMotherwell (A)xG 0.98–1.20
  6. W2–110 JanAberdeen (A)xG 2.03–0.63

Kilmarnock

  1. L0–110 FebMotherwell (H)xG 1.00–0.95
  2. L0–26 FebSt. Mirren (A)xG 0.49–1.56
  3. L0–42 FebCeltic (H)xG 1.87–2.13
  4. L2–330 JanSt. Johnstone (H)xG 1.17–2.14
  5. L0–227 JanLivingston (A)xG 0.59–1.10
  6. L0–216 JanHibernian (A)xG 0.64–0.68

The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.

Season to date

RangersKilmarnock
Position1st10th
Played2828
Won, drawn, lost24–⁠4–⁠07–⁠3–⁠18
Points76 (2.71 per game)24 (0.86 per game)
Expected Points per game2.311.14
Goals68–⁠826–⁠40
xG per game2.14–⁠0.571.01–⁠1.34
Home: points, xG per game3.00, 2.38–⁠0.531.00, 1.19–⁠1.36
Away: points, xG per game2.47, 1.94–⁠0.600.71, 0.82–⁠1.33
ManagerSteven Gerrard (28)Tommy Wright (0)

League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.

Ratings

0.51.01.52.0League average 1.18AttackRangers1.91, 1stKilmarnock0.95, 9thDefence (lower is better)Rangers0.62, 1stKilmarnock1.30, 8th

This season

Attack0.00.51.01.52.02.5SepOctNovDecJanFebRangers attack: 1.91Kilmarnock attack: 0.951.910.95KilmarnockRangersDefence (lower is better)0.00.51.01.52.02.5SepOctNovDecJanFebRangers defence: 0.62Kilmarnock defence: 1.301.300.62

The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.

Strengths and weaknesses

RangersKilmarnock
CreatedConcededCreatedConceded
Open play+90%−50%−33%+2%
Counter-attacks+23%−23%−88%−74%
Set pieces+26%−55%+5%+25%
Penalties+64%−100%+3%+3%
Headers+45%−48%−1%+1%
Left side+37%−41%−20%+19%
Centre+79%−49%−26%+3%
Right side+80%−62%−25%−5%

xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.

Matchups

Rangers attacking

Rangers createdKilmarnock concededLeft side+37%−5%Centre+79%+3%Right side+80%+19%Open play+90%+2%Counter-attacks+23%−74%Set pieces+26%+25%Headers+45%+1%

Kilmarnock attacking

Kilmarnock createdRangers concededLeft side−20%−62%Centre−26%−49%Right side−25%−41%Open play−33%−50%Counter-attacks−88%−23%Set pieces+5%−55%Headers−1%−48%

Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.

Season averages

RangersKilmarnock

2.14xG1.01
0.57xG against1.34
67%Possession46%
17.2Shots10.4
5.9Shots against13.4
5.9Shots on target3.0
2.8Big chances1.0
31.6Touches in the opposition box18.9
616Passes364
85%Pass accuracy68%
6.7Corners4.9
79%Field tilt48%
59.3Final-third entries36.9
18.2Box entries9.8
10.4Passes per defensive action14.9

Per league match this season before kick-off.

Game state this season

Rangers

StateMinutes per gamexG per 90xG against per 90
Level312.220.68
Ahead542.090.54
Behind52.270.11

Kilmarnock

StateMinutes per gamexG per 90xG against per 90
Level430.921.14
Ahead201.091.63
Behind271.081.46

xG by period

Rangers

MinutesxG per gamexG againstGoals
1–150.290.127–1
16–300.420.1217–2
31–450.280.0611–1
46–600.450.0712–0
61–750.340.0912–2
76–900.360.109–2

Kilmarnock

MinutesxG per gamexG againstGoals
1–150.100.154–4
16–300.140.224–7
31–450.190.166–3
46–600.210.215–7
61–750.210.284–8
76–900.160.333–11

Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.

Most used players by position

Rangers

GKRBCBCBLBCMCMCMRWSTLWMcGregor 19McLaughlin 9Tavernier 28Goldson 28Helander 16Balogun 12Barisic 25Bassey 3Aribo 16Arfield 10Davis 19Jack 14Hagi 2Kamara 20Hagi 12Roofe 6Kent 3Morelos 18Roofe 5Defoe 3Kent 23Hagi 2Roofe 24-3-3 in 21 of 28 starts

Formations: 4-3-3 (21), 4-2-3-1 (7)

Kilmarnock

GKRBCBCBLBCMCMCMRWSTLWRogers 24Doyle 3Eastwood 1McGowan 12Millen 11Rossi 4Broadfoot 22Rossi 3Dicker 1Findlay 21Dikamona 7Medley 2Waters 16Haunstrup 11Tshibola 1Power 23Kabamba 7Burke 2Dicker 15McKenzie 3Kiltie 3Tshibola 23Mulumbu 3Pinnock 1Burke 19McKenzie 3Pinnock 2Kabamba 12Brophy 6Kiltie 4McKenzie 10Kiltie 9Pinnock 54-3-3 in 10 of 28 starts

Formations: 4-3-3 (10), 4-4-2 (9), 4-2-3-1 (4), 4-4-1-1 (2), 4-1-4-1 (1), 3-4-3 (1), 4-5-1 (1)

This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.

Head to head

DateHomeAwayxG
1 November 2020Kilmarnock0–1RangersxG 0.50–2.80
22 August 2020Rangers2–0KilmarnockxG 2.93–0.10

2 league meetings since 2020/21: Rangers won 2, Kilmarnock won 0, and 0 were drawn. Goals 3–0 and xG 2.87–0.30 per game.

Key players

Rangers

PlayerStartsMinGAxG per 90xA per 90
Roofe131,1381020.660.11
Tavernier282,4951190.410.27
Itten3553410.430.22
Morelos181,482720.470.12

Kilmarnock

PlayerStartsMinGAxG per 90xA per 90
Burke221,928730.250.23
Brophy8637200.320.02
Kabamba191,789520.280.02
Pinnock8842030.070.23

Up to four players a side with the most xG plus xA per 90 minutes, from those with at least 450 league minutes.