Saturday 9 January 2021, 15:00 · Rugby Park · Round 23 · Half-time 1–0
Kilmarnock Kiltie 36', 63'
Post-match
Result and Expected Points
Measure
Kilmarnock
Hamilton Academical
Goals
2
0
xG
1.50
0.43
Expected Points
2.21
0.53
Kilmarnock 65%Draw 26%Hamilton Academical 9%
Most likely score 1–0, 22%. Final score 2–0, 18%.
Own goals have no xG.
xG race
Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.
Match stats
KilmarnockHamilton Academical
1.50 +0.51xG0.43 −0.44
1.21 +0.16xG on target0.06 −0.87
18 +8.2Shots6 −2.2
3 −0.1Shots on target1 −1.7
0 −1.0Big chances0 −0.9
30 +13Touches in the opposition box16 +4
63% +18Possession37% −2
539 +182Passes317 +21
77% +8Pass accuracy56% −4
76% +29Field tilt24% −7
57 +20Final-third entries27 −2
16 +7.1Box entries9 +2.8
9.3 −6Passes per defensive action21.0 +6
5 +0.1Corners3 −0.5
18 +6Tackles14 −3
15 +4Interceptions12 0
14 −3Clearances27 +4
1 −1.3Saves1 −2.9
13 +1Fouls11 −2
1 −1.3Offsides3 +1.3
The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.
Chance locations
Kilmarnock
Hamilton Academical
Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.
xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.
Game state
36'63'
0–01–02–0
0'HTFT
Level
36 min (40%) · Kilmarnock 0.63, Hamilton Academical 0.13 xG
Kilmarnock ahead
54 min (60%) · Kilmarnock 0.87, Hamilton Academical 0.31 xG
Line-ups
Kilmarnock substitutes
78'Pinnock for Burke
79'Dabo for Mulumbu
79'Kabamba for Whitehall
86'Tshibola for Power
Hamilton Academical substitutes
46'Smith for Moyo
Players
Kilmarnock
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Rogers
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
2
0
McGowan
RB
90
0.00
0.32
1
0.35
8
7
Broadfoot
CB
90
0.00
0.03
2
0.13
18
8
Findlay
CB
90
0.06
0.01
0
0.05
2
10
Haunstrup
LB
90
1
0.00
0.16
2
0.33
13
5
Burke
RM
78
0.52
0.29
4
0.02
4
0
Power
CM
86
0.03
0.06
0
0.11
14
7
Mulumbu
CM
79
1
0.09
0.04
1
0.12
12
9
McKenzie
LM
90
0.09
0.20
1
0.16
6
2
Kiltie
ST
90
2
0.44
0.06
0
0.02
1
1
Whitehall
ST
79
0.25
0.18
1
−0.10
0
0
Pinnock
MF
12
0.03
0.00
0
−0.01
0
0
Dabo
MF
11
0.00
0.00
0
−0.01
0
0
Kabamba
FW
11
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
Tshibola
MF
4
0.00
0.00
0
−0.01
0
0
Hamilton Academical
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Gourlay
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
3
1
Hamilton
CB
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.06
4
5
Stanger
CB
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
2
10
Stirling
CB
90
0.00
0.00
0
−0.01
0
4
Hodson
RWB
90
0.08
0.03
0
0.05
4
3
Odoffin
CM
90
0.06
0.00
0
0.00
1
11
Trafford
CM
90
0.04
0.01
0
0.03
2
9
McMann
LWB
90
0.08
0.10
2
0.12
7
7
Callachan
AM
90
0.00
0.13
2
0.10
6
2
Winter
ST
90
0.17
0.02
0
0.10
4
3
Moyo
ST
46
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
2
3
Smith
FW
44
0.00
0.07
1
0.06
1
1
Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.
Pass networks
Kilmarnock
Hamilton Academical
Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.
Passing combinations
Kilmarnock
From
To
Passes
McGowan
Power
14
Haunstrup
McKenzie
13
McGowan
Broadfoot
12
Broadfoot
Mulumbu
12
Mulumbu
Haunstrup
12
Hamilton Academical
From
To
Passes
Callachan
Hodson
9
Stirling
Gourlay
8
Hodson
Hamilton
7
Gourlay
Hamilton
7
Hodson
Callachan
7
The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.
Defensive actions
Kilmarnock
Against its average of 21 matches
Hamilton Academical
Against its average of 21 matches
Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.
Threat
Kilmarnock
Hamilton Academical
Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.
Ratings
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.
League probabilities
Chance
Before
With this result
Change
Kilmarnock
Top six
21%
28%
+7
11th
7%
4%
−3
Bottom
2%
1%
−1
Hamilton Academical
Top six
1%
<1%
−1
11th
31%
31%
0
Bottom
41%
49%
+8
Ross County
11th
32%
35%
+3
Bottom
42%
38%
−4
St. Mirren
Top six
42%
40%
−2
11th
4%
3%
−1
From the forecast before the match (9 January 2021): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.
Pre-match
As things stood before kick-off.
Forecast
Measure
Kilmarnock
Hamilton Academical
Expected goals
1.52
0.98
Win
49%
24%
Expected Points
1.75
0.98
Clean sheet
38%
22%
Kilmarnock 49%Draw 27%Hamilton Academical 24%
Most likely score 1–1, 13%. Both sides score 49%.
From the forecast as it stood on 9 January 2021: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.
League probabilities by result
Chance
Now
Kilmarnock win
Draw
Hamilton Academical win
Kilmarnock
Top six
21%
28%
16%
11%
11th
7%
4%
8%
13%
Bottom
2%
1%
2%
5%
Hamilton Academical
Top six
1%
<1%
<1%
2%
11th
31%
31%
30%
30%
Bottom
41%
49%
41%
27%
Ross County
11th
32%
35%
31%
24%
Bottom
42%
38%
42%
52%
St. Mirren
Top six
42%
40%
42%
46%
11th
4%
3%
4%
4%
Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.
The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.
Season to date
Measure
Kilmarnock
Hamilton Academical
Position
8th
10th
Played
21
21
Won, drawn, lost
6–3–12
5–3–13
Points
21 (1.00 per game)
18 (0.86 per game)
Expected Points per game
1.14
0.79
Goals
22–26
21–45
xG per game
0.99–1.36
0.87–2.26
Home: points, xG per game
1.10, 1.11–1.34
0.73, 0.60–2.23
Away: points, xG per game
0.91, 0.89–1.39
1.00, 1.16–2.30
Manager
Alex Dyer (21)
Brian Rice (21)
League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.
Ratings
This season
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.
Strengths and weaknesses
Chances
Kilmarnock
Hamilton Academical
Created
Conceded
Created
Conceded
Open play
−41%
+3%
−54%
+105%
Counter-attacks
−91%
−73%
−89%
+194%
Set pieces
+4%
+23%
−4%
+38%
Penalties
+27%
+1%
+27%
−24%
Headers
−19%
+1%
−17%
+95%
Left side
−16%
+8%
−33%
+93%
Centre
−34%
+4%
−36%
+110%
Right side
−33%
+8%
−55%
+43%
xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.
Hamilton Academical createdKilmarnock concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−33%+8%Centre−36%+4%Right side−55%+8%Open play−54%+3%Counter-attacks−89%−73%Set pieces−4%+23%Headers−17%+1%
Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.
Season averages
KilmarnockHamilton Academical
0.99xG0.87
1.36xG against2.26
45%Possession39%
9.8Shots8.2
14.3Shots against17.7
3.1Shots on target2.7
1.0Big chances0.9
17.2Touches in the opposition box11.8
357Passes296
69%Pass accuracy60%
4.9Corners3.5
47%Field tilt32%
36.8Final-third entries28.5
8.9Box entries6.2
15.2Passes per defensive action14.9
Per league match this season before kick-off.
Game state this season
Kilmarnock
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
42
1.02
1.29
Ahead
21
1.02
1.60
Behind
27
0.94
1.29
Hamilton Academical
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
38
0.80
2.26
Ahead
9
0.78
1.01
Behind
43
0.94
2.52
xG by period
Kilmarnock
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.11
0.18
3–4
16–30
0.16
0.24
4–6
31–45
0.16
0.15
4–2
46–60
0.21
0.18
5–4
61–75
0.20
0.27
3–3
76–90
0.15
0.35
3–7
Hamilton Academical
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.08
0.38
1–8
16–30
0.10
0.40
2–10
31–45
0.08
0.27
4–6
46–60
0.14
0.34
3–7
61–75
0.28
0.45
7–8
76–90
0.18
0.42
4–6
Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.
This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.