Wednesday 3 February 2021, 18:00 · Fountain of Youth Stadium · Round 27 · Half-time 1–0
Hamilton Academical Kelly 16' (og)
Ross County White 81', McKay 85'
Post-match
Result and Expected Points
Measure
Hamilton Academical
Ross County
Goals
1
2
xG
0.49
1.44
Expected Points
0.59
2.13
Hamilton Academical 10%Draw 28%Ross County 62%
Most likely score 0–1, 21%. Final score 1–2, 9%.
Own goals have no xG.
xG race
Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Stoppage time is shaded as far as the last shot or event recorded in it. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.
Match stats
Hamilton AcademicalRoss County
0.49 −0.34xG1.44 +0.45
0.72 −0.12xG on target1.35 +0.65
7 −1.0Shots16 +6.5
4 +1.5Shots on target5 +2.1
1 +0.2Big chances3 +1.8
20 +8Touches in the opposition box20 +5
35% −3Possession65% +17
281 −12Passes522 +143
61% +2Pass accuracy78% +7
38% +7Field tilt62% +16
28 0Final-third entries52 +16
11 +4.6Box entries12 +4.7
12.6 −2Passes per defensive action9.5 −5
4 +0.3Corners7 +2.8
19 +2Tackles13 0
13 +1Interceptions19 +8
21 −3Clearances10 −14
3 −0.7Saves4 +0.9
12 −1Fouls6 −9
1 −0.6Offsides2 +0.4
The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.
Chance locations
Hamilton Academical
Ross County
Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.
xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.
Game state
16'81'85'
0–01–0
0'HTFT
Level
20 min (21%) · Hamilton Academical 0.11, Ross County 0.60 xG
Hamilton Academical ahead
69 min (73%) · Hamilton Academical 0.38, Ross County 0.84 xG
Ross County ahead
5 min (5%) · Hamilton Academical 0.00, Ross County 0.00 xG
Line-ups
Hamilton Academical substitutes
57'Mimnaugh for Stirling
78'Winter for Ogboe
78'Moyo for Anderson
87'Thomas for Easton
Ross County substitutes
62'White for Vigurs · goal 81', 1 assist
77'Tremarco for Iacovitti
77'Lakin for Hylton
77'Gardyne for Shaw
77'McKay for Paton · goal 85'
Players
Hamilton Academical
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Fulton
GK
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.07
6
0
Hamilton
CB
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.04
5
5
Martin
CB
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
1
6
Easton
CB
87
0.00
0.01
0
0.07
7
10
Hodson
RWB
90
0.03
0.03
0
0.04
5
3
Odoffin
CM
90
0.00
0.01
1
0.02
2
11
Stirling
CM
57
0.03
0.01
1
0.01
1
8
McMann
LWB
90
0.09
0.04
0
0.11
6
6
Callachan
AM
90
0.00
0.08
1
0.06
3
2
Anderson
ST
78
0.00
0.09
2
−0.11
2
1
Ogboe
ST
78
0.32
0.01
0
−0.08
0
0
Mimnaugh
DF
33
0.03
0.00
0
0.01
2
3
Winter
FW
12
0.00
0.01
0
0.01
1
1
Moyo
FW
12
0.00
0.00
0
−0.01
0
0
Thomas
FW
3
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
Ross County
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Laidlaw
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
1
0
Morris
CB
90
0.03
0.00
0
0.04
4
7
Iacovitti
CB
77
0.00
0.01
0
0.08
7
6
Hjelde
CB
90
0.04
0.17
1
0.14
9
5
Naismith
RWB
90
1
0.12
0.27
1
0.12
7
5
Kelly
CM
90
0.03
0.07
2
0.13
14
5
Vigurs
CM
62
0.02
0.10
1
0.03
4
4
Andreu
CM
90
0.31
0.06
3
0.02
1
4
Hylton
LWB
77
0.04
0.04
2
0.06
10
1
Paton
AM
77
0.30
0.05
0
0.15
5
2
Shaw
ST
77
0.06
0.12
3
−0.05
3
0
White
FW
28
1
1
0.06
0.18
1
0.17
1
0
Tremarco
DF
13
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
0
0
Lakin
MF
13
0.00
0.00
0
0.03
2
2
Gardyne
MF
13
0.00
0.01
1
0.00
0
0
McKay
FW
13
1
0.42
0.00
0
0.01
1
1
Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.
Pass networks
Hamilton Academical
Ross County
Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.
Passing combinations
Hamilton Academical
From
To
Passes
Callachan
Hodson
13
Hodson
Callachan
9
Hamilton
Hodson
8
Hodson
Hamilton
8
Easton
Stirling
6
Ross County
From
To
Passes
Kelly
Hjelde
15
Morris
Naismith
13
Vigurs
Kelly
11
Kelly
Andreu
11
Kelly
Naismith
11
The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.
Defensive actions
Hamilton Academical
Against its average of 24 matches
Ross County
Against its average of 26 matches
Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.
Threat
Hamilton Academical
Ross County
Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.
Ratings
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.
League probabilities
Chance
Before
With this result
Change
Hamilton Academical
11th
30%
20%
−10
Bottom
53%
71%
+18
Ross County
11th
37%
44%
+7
Bottom
38%
20%
−18
From the forecast before the match (3 February 2021): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.
Pre-match
As things stood before kick-off.
Forecast
Measure
Hamilton Academical
Ross County
Expected goals
1.23
1.41
Win
32%
40%
Expected Points
1.24
1.48
Clean sheet
25%
29%
Hamilton Academical 32%Draw 27%Ross County 40%
Most likely score 1–1, 13%. Both sides score 54%.
From the forecast as it stood on 3 February 2021: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.
League probabilities by result
Chance
Now
Hamilton Academical win
Draw
Ross County win
Hamilton Academical
11th
30%
39%
34%
20%
Bottom
53%
33%
52%
71%
Ross County
11th
37%
28%
38%
44%
Bottom
38%
58%
39%
20%
Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.
The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.
Season to date
Measure
Hamilton Academical
Ross County
Position
12th
11th
Played
24
26
Won, drawn, lost
5–4–15
5–5–16
Points
19 (0.79 per game)
20 (0.77 per game)
Expected Points per game
0.78
0.83
Goals
21–49
19–50
xG per game
0.83–2.16
0.99–1.85
Home: points, xG per game
0.75, 0.61–2.09
0.77, 1.01–2.00
Away: points, xG per game
0.83, 1.05–2.23
0.77, 0.97–1.70
Manager
Brian Rice (24)
John Hughes (8)
League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.
Ratings
This season
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.
Strengths and weaknesses
Chances
Hamilton Academical
Ross County
Created
Conceded
Created
Conceded
Open play
−54%
+100%
−20%
+42%
Counter-attacks
−92%
+109%
+58%
−62%
Set pieces
−7%
+30%
−28%
+33%
Penalties
+18%
−29%
−56%
+118%
Headers
−21%
+81%
+4%
+20%
Left side
−37%
+82%
−12%
+18%
Centre
−37%
+104%
−21%
+56%
Right side
−55%
+34%
−22%
+14%
xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.
Matchups
Hamilton Academical attacking
Hamilton Academical createdRoss County concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−37%+14%Centre−37%+56%Right side−55%+18%Open play−54%+42%Counter-attacks−92%−62%Set pieces−7%+33%Headers−21%+20%
Ross County attacking
Ross County createdHamilton Academical concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−12%+34%Centre−21%+104%Right side−22%+82%Open play−20%+100%Counter-attacks+58%+109%Set pieces−28%+30%Headers+4%+81%
Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.
Season averages
Hamilton AcademicalRoss County
0.83xG0.99
2.16xG against1.85
38%Possession48%
8.0Shots9.5
17.5Shots against14.3
2.5Shots on target2.9
0.8Big chances1.2
12.5Touches in the opposition box14.7
293Passes379
59%Pass accuracy71%
3.7Corners4.2
31%Field tilt46%
28.0Final-third entries36.2
6.4Box entries7.3
15.1Passes per defensive action14.4
Per league match this season before kick-off.
Game state this season
Hamilton Academical
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
39
0.76
2.07
Ahead
8
0.78
1.01
Behind
43
0.90
2.45
Ross County
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
39
0.99
1.77
Ahead
16
0.56
1.91
Behind
35
1.18
1.91
xG by period
Hamilton Academical
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.07
0.34
1–9
16–30
0.10
0.38
2–10
31–45
0.11
0.29
4–7
46–60
0.14
0.36
3–8
61–75
0.25
0.40
7–9
76–90
0.16
0.38
4–6
Ross County
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.16
0.36
3–6
16–30
0.15
0.26
7–8
31–45
0.16
0.20
2–5
46–60
0.14
0.34
0–9
61–75
0.16
0.39
1–12
76–90
0.21
0.28
6–10
Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.
This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.