Most likely score 6+–0, 35%. Final score 8–0, 35%.
Own goals have no xG.
xG race
Each side's xG added up shot by shot through the match. Stoppage time is shaded as far as the last shot or event recorded in it. Triangles along the foot mark each side's substitutions.
Match stats
RangersHamilton Academical
4.94 +2.62xG0.00 −1.08
4.15Non-penalty xG0.00
5.30 +3.16xG on target0.00 −1.22
24 +5.2Shots0 −9.9
14 +7.5Shots on target0 −3.3
8 +5.0Big chances0 −1.0
53 +25Touches in the opposition box2 −12
77% +11Possession23% −20
681 +75Passes217 −98
90% +5Pass accuracy56% −6
93% +13Field tilt7% −30
62 +2Final-third entries10 −22
36 +17.1Box entries0 −7.5
8.4 −2Passes per defensive action23.3 +10
6 −1.3Corners0 −4.9
11 −4Tackles18 −1
11 +2.2Interceptions15 +3.3
2 −10Clearances20 −2
0 −1.3Saves6 +1.6
9 −2Fouls10 −2
3 +1.5Offsides2 +0.5
The small figure beside each value is its difference from the side's average per league match this season before this one. Field tilt is each side's share of the open-play passes completed in the final third; entries are completed open-play passes and carries into the final third and the box; passes per defensive action (PPDA) counts the opponent's passes in its own 60% of the pitch for each tackle, interception, challenge, or foul there.
Chance locations
Rangers
Hamilton Academical
Each area's share of the side's xG from open play and set pieces, with the xG in it. The two wide areas of the box count together, as on the club pages. Shots shows each of those shots instead, sized by its xG, with goals filled in.
xG by type of chance, with each side's shots and goals beside it.
Game state
16'18'19'36'54'62'65'69'
0–03–04–05–08–0
0'HTFT
Level
16 min (17%) · Rangers 0.83, Hamilton Academical 0.00 xG
Rangers ahead
78 min (83%) · Rangers 4.11, Hamilton Academical 0.00 xG
Line-ups
Rangers substitutes
46'Bassey for Barisic
46'Zungu for Jack
58'Barker for Kent · goal 62'
69'Hagi for Aribo
74'Itten for Arfield
Hamilton Academical substitutes
55'Winter for Ogboe
55'L. Smith for Hughes
72'Mimnaugh for Callachan
Players
Rangers
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
McLaughlin
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.02
1
0
Tavernier
RB
90
2
1
1.82
0.30
2
0.40
14
4
Goldson
CB
90
0.06
0.11
3
0.20
14
2
Balogun
CB
90
0.00
0.02
0
0.12
6
5
Barisic
LB
46
0.05
0.09
2
0.17
14
1
Arfield
CM
74
1
1
0.47
0.07
1
0.07
4
0
Jack
CM
46
0.00
0.04
2
0.10
6
5
Aribo
CM
69
2
0.14
0.19
1
0.18
3
4
Roofe
RW
90
2
1
1.36
0.19
1
0.13
4
0
Defoe
ST
90
1
0.20
0.23
2
0.07
2
1
Kent
LW
58
1
0.33
0.50
3
0.44
9
0
Bassey
DF
44
0.00
0.46
2
0.32
5
2
Zungu
MF
44
0.00
0.03
0
0.03
5
0
Barker
FW
32
1
0.51
0.02
0
0.11
4
0
Hagi
FW
21
0.00
0.02
0
−0.01
2
0
Itten
FW
16
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
0
0
Hamilton Academical
Player
Pos
Min
G
A
xG
xA
KP
xT
Prog
Def
Fulton
GK
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.03
3
1
Stirling
CB
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
1
5
Odoffin
CB
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
1
9
Easton
CB
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.00
2
4
Hodson
RWB
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
2
6
Callachan
CM
72
0.00
0.00
0
−0.01
2
3
Collar
CM
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
2
7
Hughes
CM
55
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
3
McMann
LWB
90
0.00
0.01
0
0.04
5
7
Ogboe
ST
55
0.00
0.00
0
−0.02
0
1
Moyo
ST
90
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
Winter
FW
35
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0
L. Smith
FW
35
0.00
0.00
0
0.01
1
5
Mimnaugh
DF
18
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
4
Starters, then substitutes in the order they came on. KP is chances created and Def defensive actions (tackles, blocks, clearances, and interceptions). xT is the expected threat added by the player's completed open-play passes and carries, and Prog counts progressive passes and carries.
Pass networks
Rangers
Hamilton Academical
Each starter at the average position of their passes and receptions until the side's first substitution or red card, sized by completed passes. Lines join pairs who passed to each other often, thicker for more passes.
Passing combinations
Rangers
From
To
Passes
Balogun
Goldson
27
Goldson
Balogun
23
Goldson
Tavernier
22
Balogun
Barisic
15
Tavernier
Goldson
14
Hamilton Academical
From
To
Passes
Callachan
Collar
9
Collar
McMann
9
McMann
Collar
7
McMann
Moyo
4
Fulton
Moyo
4
The five pairs with the most completed passes from one to the other over the whole match.
Defensive actions
Rangers
Against its average of 13 matches
Hamilton Academical
Against its average of 11 matches
Where each side made its tackles, interceptions, clearances, blocks, recoveries, challenges, and fouls, attacking up the page. Areas are shaded by the difference from the side's average per match this season before this one: amber for more, blue for fewer.
Threat
Rangers
Hamilton Academical
Expected threat added by completed open-play passes and carries, by where the move started, attacking up the page. Expected threat is the chance that possession in an area leads to a goal; a move adds the difference between where it ends and where it starts.
Ratings
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday (ring) and after it (dot); a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs after the matchday, spread up and down only so they don't overlap. The change takes in the whole matchday.
League probabilities
Chance
Before
With this result
Change
Rangers
Title
74%
76%
+2
Hamilton Academical
Top six
2%
1%
−1
11th
21%
21%
0
Bottom
52%
54%
+2
Celtic
Title
25%
24%
−1
Ross County
Top six
4%
4%
0
11th
27%
27%
0
Bottom
20%
19%
−1
From the forecast before the match (8 November 2020): each chance then, and across the simulations in which the match ended this way. The change is in percentage points.
Pre-match
As things stood before kick-off.
Forecast
Measure
Rangers
Hamilton Academical
Expected goals
3.33
0.49
Win
90%
3%
Expected Points
2.77
0.16
Clean sheet
61%
4%
Rangers 90%Draw 8%Hamilton Academical 3%
Most likely score 3–0, 14%. Both sides score 37%.
From the forecast as it stood on 8 November 2020: each side's attack and defence ratings in a Dixon–Coles score model, as on the Forecasts page.
League probabilities by result
Chance
Now
Rangers win
Draw
Hamilton Academical win
Rangers
Title
74%
76%
64%
63%
Hamilton Academical
Top six
2%
1%
3%
5%
11th
21%
21%
22%
25%
Bottom
52%
54%
45%
28%
Celtic
Title
25%
24%
35%
37%
Ross County
Top six
4%
4%
3%
4%
11th
27%
27%
27%
25%
Bottom
20%
19%
22%
29%
Each chance before the match and across the simulations ending in each result. Other teams are listed where a chance moves by at least 3 percentage points.
The last six league matches, newest first, with xG for and against.
Season to date
Measure
Rangers
Hamilton Academical
Position
1st
12th
Played
13
11
Won, drawn, lost
11–2–0
2–1–8
Points
35 (2.69 per game)
7 (0.64 per game)
Expected Points per game
2.54
0.73
Goals
29–3
13–25
xG per game
2.32–0.43
1.08–2.49
Home: points, xG per game
3.00, 2.29–0.53
0.20, 0.68–2.65
Away: points, xG per game
2.43, 2.34–0.35
1.00, 1.42–2.36
Manager
Steven Gerrard (13)
Brian Rice (11)
League matches this season before kick-off. The manager's number is league matches in charge since 2020/21.
Ratings
This season
The goals each side would score (attack) and concede (defence) per game against an average team, from the forecast ratings before this matchday, with their rank among the league's clubs; a lower defence number is better. Grey dots are the other clubs, spread up and down only so they don't overlap.
Strengths and weaknesses
Chances
Rangers
Hamilton Academical
Created
Conceded
Created
Conceded
Open play
+99%
−62%
−56%
+118%
Counter-attacks
+28%
−73%
−100%
+280%
Set pieces
+27%
−65%
+46%
+74%
Penalties
+51%
−100%
+34%
−100%
Headers
+50%
−45%
+5%
+74%
Left side
+60%
−70%
−19%
+130%
Centre
+73%
−58%
−11%
+128%
Right side
+95%
−66%
−62%
+61%
xG created and conceded per game against the league average this season: +24% is 24% more than an average side. Left and right are each side's own, so chances conceded on its left come from opponents attacking down their right. Green favours the side and amber doesn't.
Hamilton Academical createdRangers concededBelow averageAboveBelow averageAboveLeft side−19%−66%Centre−11%−58%Right side−62%−70%Open play−56%−62%Counter-attacks−100%−73%Set pieces+46%−65%Headers+5%−45%
Each side's xG created per game down each side of the pitch, through the centre, and from each type of chance, against what its opponent concedes there, both relative to the league average.
Season averages
RangersHamilton Academical
2.32xG1.08
0.43xG against2.49
66%Possession42%
18.8Shots9.9
4.8Shots against18.3
6.5Shots on target3.3
3.0Big chances1.0
27.8Touches in the opposition box14.5
606Passes315
84%Pass accuracy62%
7.3Corners4.9
80%Field tilt37%
59.7Final-third entries32.1
18.9Box entries7.5
10.6Passes per defensive action13.5
Per league match this season before kick-off.
Game state this season
Rangers
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
27
2.77
0.20
Ahead
61
2.12
0.55
Behind
2
2.35
0.00
Hamilton Academical
State
Minutes per game
xG per 90
xG against per 90
Level
32
0.97
2.77
Ahead
1
0.00
0.00
Behind
58
1.15
2.37
xG by period
Rangers
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.40
0.05
5–0
16–30
0.43
0.09
8–1
31–45
0.28
0.06
4–0
46–60
0.46
0.04
4–0
61–75
0.37
0.07
4–1
76–90
0.39
0.12
4–1
Hamilton Academical
Minutes
xG per game
xG against
Goals
1–15
0.07
0.48
0–7
16–30
0.16
0.50
1–6
31–45
0.13
0.32
4–4
46–60
0.17
0.35
1–3
61–75
0.32
0.45
3–2
76–90
0.23
0.38
4–3
Per game this season, with stoppage time counted in its half; goals are totals for and against.
Most used players by position
Rangers
Formations: 4-3-3 (7), 4-2-3-1 (6)
Hamilton Academical
Formations: 4-4-2 (8), 4-3-1-2 (2), 3-4-1-2 (1)
This season's most used formation, with up to three players who started most often in each position and their league starts there. Underneath, when a side has used more than one, every formation with its starts.